🚀 go-pugleaf

"Wolfgang Wildeblood" <wolfgangwildeblood@gmail.com> wrote 
> On Sep 23, 2:12 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads.
>>
>> Posting more than one page number at once got the connections crossed!
>>
>> hahaha classic psychic's excuse!
>>
>> But I was sure I was getting answers - spider hidden in the corner, not enough
>> evidence for a court case, mechanics bottles on the shelf, superintendant on
>> the train, did my bit for solidarity (solar panels) etc.
>>
>> Think up 6 more questions, grab a couple six sided dice and you can post
>> 1 question (PAGE# & LINE#) at a time until I tell you the answer.
>>
>> Or if you prefer to test out my FormToEmail website I'm just waiting on support
>> to fix the web mail.  Usenet might be the better protocol, one refinement at a time.
> 
> No, it might not! Why don't you and Sylvia take this private
> discussion to email, and off usenet for good!? FFS, Herc!


It's just a psychic demo.  Once we've got some real stats then I'll stop pestering
the skeptics.

If you could figure out "for you here every day" meant the internet was NOT a fad
we wouldn't be doing this.

We also have to try listing the page numbers in the MD5'd question file, that
might have been the problem.

Herc