🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 23, 2:50 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Wolfgang Wildeblood" <wolfgangwildebl...@gmail.com> wrote
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 23, 2:12 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> I figured out the problem with the last 2 batches of 3 'blindly answer' mind reads.
>
> >> Posting more than one page number at once got the connections crossed!
>
> >> hahaha classic psychic's excuse!
>
> >> But I was sure I was getting answers - spider hidden in the corner, not enough
> >> evidence for a court case, mechanics bottles on the shelf, superintendant on
> >> the train, did my bit for solidarity (solar panels) etc.
>
> >> Think up 6 more questions, grab a couple six sided dice and you can post
> >> 1 question (PAGE# & LINE#) at a time until I tell you the answer.
>
> >> Or if you prefer to test out my FormToEmail website I'm just waiting on support
> >> to fix the web mail.  Usenet might be the better protocol, one refinement at a time.
>
> > No, it might not! Why don't you and Sylvia take this private
> > discussion to email, and off usenet for good!? FFS, Herc!
>
> It's just a psychic demo.  Once we've got some real stats then I'll stop pestering
> the skeptics.

You're not pestering the skeptics, you're pestering aus.tv. (And you
wouldn't be if I had my way.)


> If you could figure out "for you here every day" meant the internet was NOT a fad
> we wouldn't be doing this.

Excuse you. You're a paranoid schizophrenic addicted to online porn.
How do you know what's a fad? You can just fuck right off, Jerc.