Thread View: sci.space.history
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by falcon.900
Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:46
what what a couple of losers
Author: falcon.900
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:46
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:46
14 lines
1729 bytes
1729 bytes
what what a couple of losers little alan erskine and little marty wallace & assoc. are bucause they making harassing Ku Klux Klan phone calls with obscene, threatening language, heavy breathing, silence and with the words Ku Klux Klan, niger, fuck, dick, suck, pussy, shit, gay, ass, ANIMAL SEX and alot of other words i don't want to post BECAUSE I AM A CHRISTIAN.
Re: what what a couple of losers
Author: André PE1PQX
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:26
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:26
17 lines
1671 bytes
1671 bytes
falcon.900@live.com bracht volgend id�e uit : > what what a couple of losers > little alan erskine and > little marty wallace & assoc. > are bucause they making > harassing Ku Klux Klan phone > calls with obscene, threatening > language, heavy breathing, > silence and with the words > Ku Klux Klan, niger, fuck, dick, > suck, pussy, shit, gay, > ass, ANIMAL SEX and > alot of other words i > don't want to post > BECAUSE I AM A CHRISTIAN. And what is your contribution into this world!?!
Re: what what a couple of losers
Author: Martha Adams
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17
20 lines
1948 bytes
1948 bytes
<falcon.900@live.com> wrote in message news:c738ccc5-6e16-4dc1-aa92-fb3ee15af214@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > what what a couple of losers > little alan erskine and > little marty wallace & assoc. > are bucause they making > harassing Ku Klux Klan phone > calls with obscene, threatening > language, heavy breathing, > silence and with the words > Ku Klux Klan, niger, fuck, dick, > suck, pussy, shit, gay, > ass, ANIMAL SEX and > alot of other words i > don't want to post > BECAUSE I AM A CHRISTIAN. Well! Now I know what a CHRISTIAN is like. Titeotwawki -- mha [2008 Aug 05]
Re: what what a couple of losers
Author: Willie.Mookie
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:00
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:00
75 lines
4766 bytes
4766 bytes
On Aug 5, 1:17 pm, "Martha Adams" <mh...@verizon.net> wrote: > <falcon....@live.com> wrote in message > > news:c738ccc5-6e16-4dc1-aa92-fb3ee15af214@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > > > what what a couple of losers > > little alan erskine and > > little marty wallace & assoc. > > are bucause they making > > harassing Ku Klux Klan phone > > calls with obscene, threatening > > language, heavy breathing, > > silence and with the words > > Ku Klux Klan, niger, fuck, dick, > > suck, pussy, shit, gay, > > ass, ANIMAL SEX and > > alot of other words i > > don't want to post > > BECAUSE I AM A CHRISTIAN. > > Well! Now I know what a CHRISTIAN is like. > > Titeotwawki -- mha [2008 Aug 05] Hyde Park in London has a long tradition of free speech - since the Public Parks act of 1872. There is a speaker's corner there and by British tradition, anyone can say nearly anything they like and have an audience. Now, when speakers discussed subjects that the authorities would rather not have discussed, because of this tradition, they found it difficult to just go out an arrest someone - due to public backlash. So, authorities developed less direct methods to end the discussion of those they'd rather not have speak freely. This included baiting the speakers with angry audience members. Sometimes two people would be planted in the audience and one would use foul language, shouting obsenities at the top of their lungs. Another would shout back, if they couldn't get the speaker engaged. They might even have fights, or pick pockets of other audience members, anything to draw the attention of police and cause the speaker to be arrested, turned out, or otherwise shut up - for reasons OTHER than his or her speaking. Even if the speakers are not arrested or deterred from speaking - the audience frequently was! A Victorian gentleman or lady might listen to a speech, but when disrupted by hooligans shouting obscenities, it put a bad light on the whole proceeding - and many otherwise interested parties, just moved on. In the modern era thse techniques go by the term 'ratfucking' - modern information wafere techniques carry it to the next level. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_warfare Now, the internet is turning into an electronic global version of Hyde Park in the 21st century. It must be discussion of controlled information is monitored in this venue, and when such information iroutinely puts controlled information at risk of disclosure, methods must be used to reduce that risk. What better techniques to use than those that have proven so effective at Hyde Park in the Victorian era? Is it reasonable to think that this low sci.space.policy group is the subject of info war techniques? Well, if it becomes a vehicle for the global disimination of missile technology - by law the US government and other signers of the Missile Technology Control Regime MUST act to cut off that channel of information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Technology_Control_Regime ditto for nuclear and other restricted technolgies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_proliferation
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads