Article View: sci.space.policy
Article #94Re: Our moon is hot, Venus is not
From: BradGuth
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 20:17
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 20:17
168 lines
10376 bytes
10376 bytes
On Mar 10, 9:21 pm, "Brad Guth" <bradg...@yahoo.com> wrote: > "Bill Bonde" <tributyltinpa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > > news:esvon0$rl4$1@news.datemas.de > > > Brad Guth wrote: > > > How about for starters, a doable collective of POOFs at VL2? > > > > A crew shift every 19 months, with those mostly robotic deliveries of > > > beer and pizza in between. > > > That's a good example of what I was talking about. > > You must realize that Venus L2 is a relatively cool location, and from > that vantage point we could manage to toss a few of those frozen pizzas > and whatever empty beer cans at Venus for the real science of it all. > > We could even lower a special fishing line in order to deploy whatever > micro science instrument(s), or in order to recover whatever upper > atmospheric samples. > > A robotic form of a composite rigid airship that would cruise nearly > forever, as efficiently and safely below them thick clouds, as such this > form of a rather nifty buoyant probe could be rather easily remote > pilotted from VL2, without hardly any significant loop delay (6.762 > seconds or less isn't all that bad). > > Venus L2 = 1,014,290 km > - > Brad Guth > > -- > Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server -http://www.Mailgate.ORG In order to accommodate our frail DNA at Venus L2 (aka VL2 POOF City) is going to take some expertise that's well above what little most of us outsiders currently understand. Obviously the Bigelow team of expertise and applied POOF physics shouldn't have any problems. However, the following bits of information should otherwise help the rest of us village idiots process towards having a somewhat better understanding, as to why VL2 is so much more doable than our moon's L1 (aka Clarke Station or that of my spendy LSE-CM/ISS). Shuttle @ISS reveives 1354~1374 w/m2 + planet and moon IR shine Planetshine IR Heat Flux [W/m2] earthshine radiance IR [W/m2] = > 266 w/m2 (day/night average) venusshine radiance IR [W/m2] = < 532 w/m2 ? (nighttime) Our moon's IR shine IR [W/m2] = < 685 w/m2 ? (daytime) Spaceflight Plant Chamber Design / Sunlight spectrum UV~IR: 1390 W/m2 http://europa.ieec.fcr.es/english/formacio/cva/apunts/P._Planas/Presentation.pdf The Sun is characterised as a blackbody emitting radiation at 5762 K · The average solar radiation falling at right angles at a distance of 1 AU is called the Solar Constant (1371 +/ - 10 W/ m 2 ) · In actual fact the Solar irradiation is not constant: - Negligible 11- year Solar cycle (0.5% variability) - Stationality caused by the Earth elliptical orbit (3.5% variability) >From LEO, earth albedo shifts fro as great as 60% yo as little as 20% Flux (W/m2) (H=600km) (H=35,786 km) Solar (*) 1371 1371 F (D) IR shine (**) 326 9.0 Albedo (***) 343 4.0 Example: sphere in space Material á å á/å T sphere (K) Gold on Al 0.26 0.03 8.7 478.8 Black paint 0.95 0.85 1.1 285.5 Kapton on Al 0.48 0.81 0.6 245.4 White paint 0.20 0.85 0.2 186.4 Polar orbit around the Moon, altitude of 100 km · Spin- stabilised S/C, with spin axis kept perpendicular to polar orbit plane by day = 400 K (+127°C) by night = 85 k (-188°C) ESA Thermal Analysis Tools developed & maintained by Alstom, see: http://www.techcentreuk.power.alstom.com/ - While upon the nighttime surface of the moon = 110 K (-163°C) Interstellar, such as our Sol L1 --> Sirius = 5~10 K (-265°C) The extremely cold deep space sink temperature = ~3K (-270°C) - Of how much our moon contributes to global warming is simply not the insignificant amount that's being mainstream suggested. How top secret is the station-keeping thermal budget of our moon's L1, or for that of Venus L2 is however worth our further appreciating, especially since there's no good reasons for such scientific banishment. Obviously whenever I've asked of others to suggest or estimate upon the thermal budget considerations at Venus L2(VL2), as such there really shouldn't have been any insurmountable problems, yet lo and behold there was nothing but another gauntlet of insurmountable flak and/or naysayism running amuck, telling me that we're still bucking up against that pesky need to know basis or otherwise getting blocked by their mainstream taboo/nondisclosure policy, as likely the same infomercial spewing policy as to why ESA's Venus EXPRESS mission's PFS instrument has been kept need-to-know, off-line or otherwise as having been remote terminated by those wishing to keep their previous lies as to why Venus is so ungodly greenhouse hot as the one and only official scientific interpretation. This nearly insurmountable gauntlet of infomercial science, of either disinformation or simply that of evidence exclusion is not by any mistake or by some perfectly innocent skewed reasoning, but rather as a direct result of orchestrated efforts and the actions of others in direct benefit, as taken on by the very highest levels of religion and of their puppet governments that'll obviously do whatever it takes for keeping such lids on tight, such lies in place, as well as published into those textbooks and science journals that count, and even as having been NOVA televised production worthy. Sadly, we are currently being lied to about our moon and Venus, and thus far I can't even exclude Sirius from being at risk of having been a good part of those other two lies. Earth's planetology is simply too unlike Mars, Venus and especially unlike our salty old moon with all of those substantial yet so unusually shallow craters (as though that moon of ours had once upon a time a substantial layer of ice on deck). In fact, all other planets and moons of this DNA limited solar system are simply too happenstance and/or individually weird to explain as having been created early on by the very same cloud of stellar composition, as that of our sun along with such an odd collection of planets and moons. If to be accepting the existing explanations as to all that we supposedly know, it's as though our solar system was the one and only such solar system that so happened to be in the one and only exact best of all locations for having benefitted from all else we can perceive, that's within the existing scope of modern astronomy and as otherwise explained by those regular or even conditional laws of physics, whereas the odds of that being the case are just slightly more than astronomical, if not greater than Godly. The missing mass of Sirius-B (3X < 4X solar mass), and of whatever associated planets, moons or icy Oort cloud debris that became 'red- giant phase' consummed and/or pushed away from that robust star system is nothing short of being the most likely holy grail of whatever contributed the greater substance to the complex assumulation of becoming part our solar system, yet the Sirius star/solar system is still treated as taboo/nondisclosure, as well as excluded and/or banished from whatever 3D interactive simulations, and just plain and silply intellectually banished as though it doesn't exist. The best reason(s) for accomplishing POOF City at VL2 is that there has been more than sufficient evidence that Venus is substantially less old than Earth, as well as having accommodated intelligent other life, though unfortunately we're so totally snookered and/or dumbfounded past the point of no return, that which auto-rejects upon such other intelligent life as having been existing/coexisting where it's supposedly too hot and nasty for our DNA and thereby doesn't matter (regardless of whatever applied technology or alternative evolution), especially being naysay worthy to those in charge of officially interpreting whatever, and otherwise in charge of having been publishing and/or promoting as to whatever's worthy of receiving our best talents and resources. It's like going back to the circus, whereas all that you get to see is in one way or another an illusion or deliberate hocus-pocus act of clowns having been deceiving those of us in the audience, and for the most part we keep returning to that infomercial skewed circus for the eye-popping candy and/or mind binding entertainment value that has little if anything to do with the truth. After all, being a faith-based happy camper is all that matters. Right? - Brad Guth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1178741838.824275.227420@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3a60714221c90122f9536d48cd9d5478.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> <170e7f4a50fbea652921f23290dcbc27.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> <m123v2piljg72b98c5fctu8q6fk08d52us@4ax.com> <esvcfi$kca$5@news.datemas.de> <662a3a6450e333aa29e3adf9c66bded3.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> <esvon0$rl4$1@news.datemas.de> <4d04b1b8e1a0f111b3806f2b009ad7f9.49644@mygate.mailgate.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10e6d0,9ca1e2921614f74c X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,9ca1e2921614f74c X-Google-Thread: fdb98,9ca1e2921614f74c X-Google-Thread: 1006c3,9ca1e2921614f74c X-Google-Thread: 102f53,e1ea649e0ead7830,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10e6d0,gid106b5d,gidfdb98,gid1006c3,gid102f53,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.space.policy,rec.org.mensa,rec.arts.sf.science,soc.culture.scientists,cam.misc Subject: Re: Our moon is hot, Venus is not Date: 9 May 2007 13:17:18 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 169 Message-ID: <1178741838.824275.227420@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <3a60714221c90122f9536d48cd9d5478.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> <170e7f4a50fbea652921f23290dcbc27.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> <m123v2piljg72b98c5fctu8q6fk08d52us@4ax.com> <esvcfi$kca$5@news.datemas.de> <662a3a6450e333aa29e3adf9c66bded3.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> <esvon0$rl4$1@news.datemas.de> <4d04b1b8e1a0f111b3806f2b009ad7f9.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.91.99.128 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178741839 28446 127.0.0.1 (9 May 2007 20:17:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:17:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <4d04b1b8e1a0f111b3806f2b009ad7f9.49644@mygate.mailgate.org> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MSN 2.5; Windows 98; T312461),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.91.99.128; posting-account=zEXP4w0AAAAJ5s7atsfc5JlL--hpDELy