🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3617

Re: Shuttle replacement, STS-52 half-full

#3617
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:42
23 lines
1364 bytes
Actually, I was trying to support the Space Shuttle, not insult those who
work on STS and payloads.
 
But you must admit, I think, that STS-52 was darned near half-full, despite
the SVS tests with the robot arm. It is my opinion that SVS could have easily
been added to another flight, such as the STS-54 TDRS-F flight next January.
Even with TDRS-F/IUS and the DXS payload, it would seem SVS should have fit.
 
As for the USMP-1 payload, well once upon a time (STS-41D to be specific)
NASA launched three satellites aboard Shuttle, and still had space for
the OAST-1 solar array system. Now, it seems, NASA considers one satellite
(and a very small one at that) plus one pallet a full manifest.
 
What gives?
 
-Brian
 
P.S., I consider myself more than mildly supportive of the Space Shuttle,
but when NASA starts flying half-empty Space Shuttles and saying "the mission
was full", I get worried.
 
Challenger wasn't that long ago.
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <69647@cup.portal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
References: <s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <69532@cup.portal.com> <1992Nov15.060518.20381@cs.sfu.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space
Subject: Re: Shuttle replacement, STS-52 half-full
Message-ID: <69647@cup.portal.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 17:42:25 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
References: <s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <69532@cup.portal.com>
  <1992Nov15.060518.20381@cs.sfu.ca>
Lines: 23