Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3617Re: Shuttle replacement, STS-52 half-full
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:42
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:42
23 lines
1364 bytes
1364 bytes
Actually, I was trying to support the Space Shuttle, not insult those who work on STS and payloads. But you must admit, I think, that STS-52 was darned near half-full, despite the SVS tests with the robot arm. It is my opinion that SVS could have easily been added to another flight, such as the STS-54 TDRS-F flight next January. Even with TDRS-F/IUS and the DXS payload, it would seem SVS should have fit. As for the USMP-1 payload, well once upon a time (STS-41D to be specific) NASA launched three satellites aboard Shuttle, and still had space for the OAST-1 solar array system. Now, it seems, NASA considers one satellite (and a very small one at that) plus one pallet a full manifest. What gives? -Brian P.S., I consider myself more than mildly supportive of the Space Shuttle, but when NASA starts flying half-empty Space Shuttles and saying "the mission was full", I get worried. Challenger wasn't that long ago.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<69647@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianTReferences:
<s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <69532@cup.portal.com> <1992Nov15.060518.20381@cs.sfu.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Subject: Re: Shuttle replacement, STS-52 half-full Message-ID: <69647@cup.portal.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 17:42:25 PST Organization: The Portal System (TM) References: <s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <69532@cup.portal.com> <1992Nov15.060518.20381@cs.sfu.ca> Lines: 23