Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3618Re: Shuttle replacement
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:53
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:53
18 lines
1294 bytes
1294 bytes
>> Atlas and Delta are providing profits for the companies that make them << As for Delta, absolutely, positively right. But I fail to see how depositing two enormously expensive satellites in the Atlantic can be said to be a profit for General Dynamics and the Atlas. One more misfire, and GD might be relegated to government flights only (Ariane will make a killing). Besides, you seem to have missed my point. The Space Shuttle was already more-or-less paid for, so why not use it. I was trying to say (got sidetracked, I must admit) that the U.S. should have put its money into a new unmanned booster system, not tired old designs like Titan and Atlas. In the meantime, we should have continued to use Shuttle to launch as much as possible until an NLS-or-whatever came online. It would be online by now, I think, if we hadn't taken the Titan IV plunge. -Brian
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<69649@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianTReferences:
<s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <69532@cup.portal.com> <dlv1cgm@rpi.edu> <1992Nov16.142949.15445@iti.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Subject: Re: Shuttle replacement Message-ID: <69649@cup.portal.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 17:53:56 PST Organization: The Portal System (TM) References: <s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <69532@cup.portal.com> <dlv1cgm@rpi.edu> <1992Nov16.142949.15445@iti.org> Lines: 18