🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan6.183139.3779@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:
>In <1993Jan5.211231.5031@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> tes@gothamcity.uucp (Thomas E. Smith [LORAL]) writes:
>>I'm just guessing on my figures, but wasn't 500 lbs of moon rock and dust 
>>brought back from the moon? And didn't the entire Moon program cost around
>>$67 billion? I think that puts the moon dust/rocks at about $134,000,000 a 
>>pound! But as Ken says, it ain't fer sale by Nasa.
>
>Of course, the preceding reasoning assumes that the sole function of
>the entire Moon program was to produce those rocks as a product.  I
>think there was just a BIT more to it than that.  Using the same
>logic, one could say that we paid $67 billion to develop Tang.
>
For $67 billion, I would have thought they could have also freeze dried the
vodka :-).  (Has anyone tried the freeze dried beer from Japan.  It tastes like
hell until you are about four days out on the trail.)
--
Dillon Pyron                      | The opinions expressed are those of the
TI/DSEG Lewisville VAX Support    | sender unless otherwise stated.
(214)462-3556 (when I'm here)     |
(214)492-4656 (when I'm home)     |"Pacts with the devil are not legally
pyron@skndiv.dseg.ti.com          |binding!"
PADI DM-54909                     |-Friar Tuck   _Robin Hood:The Hooded Man_