Article View: sci.space
Article #7907Re: Payload of shuttle flight directly after last Challenger.
From: Eric Green
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1988 01:08
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1988 01:08
20 lines
1470 bytes
1470 bytes
in article <347@flatline.UUCP>, erict@flatline.UUCP (eric townsend) says:
> 2. If so, I thought there was a law or treaty or something that we're
> involved with that prohibits the launching of radioactive material
> into space; and that this treaty was the reason we don't put nuclear
> reactors into space.
There is a treaty banning nuclear WEAPONS in space. But there is no treaty
banning nuclear REACTORS in space. Remember that Russian satellite that broke
up over Canada a few years back, spewing low-level radiation over a wide
swath? It was powered by a nuclear reactor....
Your friend the nut case might have been thinking about the SDI payload that
was recently sent up on a Delta(?) rocket... it was originally scheduled for
the shuttle, back when the shuttle was planned to fly, well, now.
--
Eric Lee Green elg@usl.CSNET Asimov Cocktail,n., A verbal bomb
{cbosgd,ihnp4}!killer!elg detonated by the mention of any
Snail Mail P.O. Box 92191 subject, resulting in an explosion
Lafayette, LA 70509 of at least 5,000 words.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3212@killer.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!ge-dab!codas!killer!elgReferences:
<347@flatline.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!ge-dab!codas!killer!elg From: elg@killer.UUCP (Eric Green) Newsgroups: sci.space,sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: Payload of shuttle flight directly after last Challenger. Message-ID: <3212@killer.UUCP> Date: 4 Feb 88 01:08:10 GMT References: <347@flatline.UUCP> Organization: Bayou Telecommunications Lines: 20