Article View: talk.environment
Article #4069Re: 12 States May Adopt CA Standards
From: Wael El-Sharif
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 1994 15:46
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 1994 15:46
84 lines
4990 bytes
4990 bytes
In article <2ib43b$lr5@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>, R S Rodgers <rsrodger@wam.umd.edu> wrote: >In article <2i8sob$qb@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu>, >Wael El-Sharif <waele@seas.gwu.edu> wrote: >>I have to disagree, new cars are less of a problem than old cars. Electric >>vehicles are much cleaner; granted the technology is not yet perfect but it >>is getting there. > > > What makes you think EVs are cleaner? They may be locally > cleaner (e.g., no local emissions, only battery-related pollution) > but the charge in those batteries was produced at a power plant. > It is unrealistic to seriously claim that most people will be recharging > their cars at night when "demands are less." > > We're going to have to build new power plants if EVs get anywhere. > It's a fact of life. Another fact: they're not going to be nice, > clean nuclear plants because the environmentalists have done a nice > job getting legislation enacted and spreading fear. They're going > to be oil plants. Coal plants. Hydroelectric plants. None of which > are as benign to the environment as the nuclear option. > > >> When EVs are commercialized the price will drop and >>with the on-going improvements in battery technology, performance will >>improve leaving no excuses. > > > It depends on how you define "battery technology"--it's pretty unlikely > that current battery technologies will _ever_ evolve into something > that will make EVs of equal safety and performance to gasoline cars > possible. Alternatives (e.g., flywheels) might do the trick, but > then again, they might not. > > I also got a mail message discussing the same concern: EVs are MUCH CLEANER even with the current technology. The following sample takes into account Gasoline Vehicles tale-pipe emissions in comparison with power plant emissions at the current generation mix: Emissions in lbs./MWH CO2 = 1,285 CO = 0.230 N2O = 0.024 EVs cuurently require 0.35 kwh/mi CO2 => EV emissions = 204 grams/mile compared to conventional vehicles at 456 g/m CO => EV emissions = 0.0366 grams/mile compared to conventional vehicles at 17.66 g/m * data is for passenger cars. Sources: OECD, & EPA MOBILE 5a That is CLEANER. As for having to build new power plants, the answer is not necessarily - at least not on a large scale. Because of Demand Side Management (DSM), electric utilities in the U.S. have differed the need to build about 54 medium size power plants. DSM aims at reducing peak demand by offering incentives to customers to use more efficient electric equipment. Should the need to build more plants arise, it will still be cleaner as can be seen from the above figures. At the power plants emissions are controllable and are away from our homes. As for "battery technology" look at the improvements over the past few month. The government, auto manufacturers and electric utilities are spending significant amounts of money to speed up battery R&D. These funds were not available before and hence there was not much innovation. Know things are different. Electric vehicles will come to be whether we like it or not. The price will drop - simple economics, mass production. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Wael M. El-Sharif *** Opinions Expressed Are My Own *** Consulting Engineer Internet: waele@seas.gwu.edu or elshari@cap.gwu.edu -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Wael M. El-Sharif *** Opinions Expressed Are My Own *** Consulting Engineer Internet: waele@seas.gwu.edu or elshari@cap.gwu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2ibc1c$3mu@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!news.belwue.de!news.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.dkrz.de!dscomsa!dxcern!EU.net!uknet!demon!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!gwu.edu!waeleReferences:
<1994Jan12.110244@gyrfalcon.gsfc.nasa.gov> <2heq61$lfv@access.digex.net> <2i8sob$qb@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu> <2ib43b$lr5@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101cd0,b0dad6616bff129f X-Google-Attributes: gid101cd0,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,b0dad6616bff129f X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 105dfd,b0dad6616bff129f X-Google-Attributes: gid105dfd,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,b0dad6616bff129f X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,b0dad6616bff129f X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: 132ebc,b0dad6616bff129f X-Google-Attributes: gid132ebc,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-01-28 07:46:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!news.belwue.de!news.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.dkrz.de!dscomsa!dxcern!EU.net!uknet!demon!pipex!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!gwu.edu!waele From: waele@seas.gwu.edu (Wael El-Sharif) Newsgroups: talk.environment,dc.general,dc.politics,dc.driving,um.general,gsfc.general Subject: Re: 12 States May Adopt CA Standards Date: 28 Jan 1994 15:46:52 GMT Organization: George Washington University Lines: 84 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <2ibc1c$3mu@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu> References: <1994Jan12.110244@gyrfalcon.gsfc.nasa.gov> <2heq61$lfv@access.digex.net> <2i8sob$qb@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu> <2ib43b$lr5@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.164.16.1 Keywords: CA EV electric cars