Re: slander? (was RE A.C.T.)

Article View: talk.euthanasia

Article #168

#168

From: David Moss
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 00:00

16 lines
968 bytes

adm@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au (David Moss) writes:

>The burden of proof is yours Iain. You alleged I described a
>pro-euthanasia WWW resource as unbiased, thereby defaming my

Whoops !
Should read "anti-euthanasia", not "pro-euthanasia".
My apologies to anyone I confused.

Some of us have no problem admitting our mistakes and apologising.

David Moss,
personal opinion only.
http://www.adfa.oz.au/~adm/politics for unbiased Oz politics info.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <adm.857945731@ccadfa>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <331F7C42.7F70@dsto.defence.gov.au> <adm.857712262@ccadfa>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111fed,3f273fa468a2a726
X-Google-Attributes: gid111fed,public
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,3f273fa468a2a726
X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public
From: adm@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au (David Moss)
Subject: Re: slander? (was RE A.C.T.)
Date: 1997/03/09
Message-ID: <adm.857945731@ccadfa>
X-Deja-AN: 224245890
References: <331F7C42.7F70@dsto.defence.gov.au> <adm.857712262@ccadfa>
Organization: ADFA News Service
Newsgroups: talk.euthanasia,aus.general

Reply to Parent Message