Article View: tor.arts
Article #17Re: FreeNet Threats
From: Bob Richards
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00
52 lines
3751 bytes
3751 bytes
In article <3utq89$a1e@news1.best.com>, gazissax@shell1.best.com (Joel and
Lynn GAzis-SAx) wrote:
> In article <bob-2307950013500001@ts4-04.inforamp.net>,
> bob@inforamp.net (Bob Richards) wrote:
> >In article <DBy35w.Kuq.0.queen@torfree.net>, ab330@torfree.net (Bob
> >Allisat) wrote:
> >
>
> > Well,boB,I must say you take a pounding better than anyone else.I've
> >watched your postings escalate to their present level and am amazed you
> >havent got toasted yet.To all the idiots around the world that think they
> >should flame boB because of Netiquette I say Fuck You.boB is ay least
> >real.Most of you are Slugs.
> >
> > Bob Richards *~*~*~ bob@inforamp.net [][][][]
> > @@@@@@@@ %%%%%%%%
> > ()()()() Digital Cave Art =/=/=/=/
>
>
> The sad thing about those who think abuse should be protected on the Net is
> that they really seem to believe there is any substance to these fighting
> words.
Substance?Like your boring Web Page???(using the term loosely...)
When faced with persistant and reasonable argument, they resort to
> crude epithet and vulgar outbursts in the hope that they can silence the
> opposition.
Or fan the flames...Dont like the F-word huh,Spud? Check out America
On-Line.It's "nice and safe".Wont shock your delicate sensibilities.
This is not free discussion.
Why is'nt it?What idiotic constraints are you imposing on this
discussiion by your anal -retentive obsession with "crude epithet"?My
opinion is just as valid as yours;probably more so since all you are
doing is objecting to my statement while offering up nothing but recycled
politically-correct platitudes.Mine is,at least ,an opinion.Go watch TV or
something.
This is a pathetic attempt to set
> oneself up as a cultural dictator against the well-thought out and democratic
> standards of nettiquette.
You are the dictator here,Bucko. You talk about Democracy , yet wish to
silence everyone that doesnt agree with your narrow pointillistic view.As
for "well-thought out",you obviously contributed nothing to that
thinking.Thinking and reacting are two separate acts.Quite frankly,you
fail the grade at both.
Bob Richards *~*~*~ bob@inforamp.net [][][][]
@@@@@@@@ %%%%%%%%
()()()() Digital Cave Art =/=/=/=/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bob-2707952225480001@ts2-05.inforamp.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DBy35w.Kuq.0.queen@torfree.net> <bob-2307950013500001@ts4-04.inforamp.net> <3utq89$a1e@news1.best.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f504b,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public X-Google-Thread: fc3d0,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d0,public X-Google-Thread: 1085e3,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1085e3,public X-Google-Thread: ff174,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidff174,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public X-Google-Thread: f49a5,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf49a5,public X-Google-Thread: 10200a,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10200a,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,f1694c25b79f71b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public From: bob@inforamp.net (Bob Richards) Subject: Re: FreeNet Threats Date: 1995/07/27 Message-ID: <bob-2707952225480001@ts2-05.inforamp.net> X-Deja-AN: 107053149 references: <DBy35w.Kuq.0.queen@torfree.net> <bob-2307950013500001@ts4-04.inforamp.net> <3utq89$a1e@news1.best.com> organization: Cosmic Abuse Unlimited Toronto,Canada newsgroups: tor.arts,can.infohighway,news.admin.policy,comp.admin.policy,alt.culture.usenet,tor.general,ont.general,can.general,mtl.general,bc.general,aus.general,uk.general,nyc.general,ny.general,la.general,ca.general,ab.general,ns.general,nb.general,pei.general,nz.general