Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis

Article View: tor.uucp

Article #13

#13

From: Peter Honeyman
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 22:33

9 lines
926 bytes

william E Davidsen writes:
|>   Greater packet overhead, I suspect. Are you using uucp spoofing to
|> eliminate sending all the overhead on the wire? S111.

this perpetuates a myth regarding telebit uucp spoofing.  it is
false.  the 'g' headers are *not* stripped, they are sent from one
modem to the next. 

	peter

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep2.223307.29625@terminator.cc.umich.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!destroyer!terminator!honey

References: <1992Sep01.011942.27875@r-node.gts.org> <1992Sep2.143752.15142@crd.ge.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: tor.uucp,ont.uucp,comp.dcom.modems,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.protocols.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!destroyer!terminator!honey
From: honey@citi.umich.edu (Peter Honeyman)
Subject: Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis
Message-ID: <1992Sep2.223307.29625@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
Sender: news@terminator.cc.umich.edu (Usenet Owner)
Reply-To: honey@citi.umich.edu
Organization: Center for Information Technology Integration, Univ of Michigan
References: <1992Sep01.011942.27875@r-node.gts.org> <1992Sep2.143752.15142@crd.ge.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 22:33:07 GMT
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message