Article View: tor.uucp
Article #14Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis
From: Anton J Aylward
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:35
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:35
19 lines
1007 bytes
1007 bytes
ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes: : marc@r-node.gts.org (Marc Fournier - Sys Admin) writes: : : > Why do I get better speeds with zmodem using v.32bis on : >a Worldblazer then uucico? : : Because Zmodem is a better protocol with less overhead than UUCP's : g protocol. "Better" for what, under what circumstances? Conversely what are the circumstances where uucp is "better" than Zmodem? Kindly don't pontificate absolutes, there are no absolutes. Only religious zealots think otherwise, which is why we call them "religious wars". -- Anton J Aylward
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep3.003534.26968@analsyn.gts.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!canrem!telly!druid!uunorth!antonReferences:
<1992Sep1.201132.6630@zooid.guild.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: tor.uucp,ont.uucp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!canrem!telly!druid!uunorth!anton From: anton@analsyn.gts.org (Anton J Aylward) Subject: Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis Message-ID: <1992Sep3.003534.26968@analsyn.gts.org> Organization: ASCI: UNIX Database and Communications X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4 References: <1992Sep1.201132.6630@zooid.guild.org> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 00:35:34 GMT Lines: 19