🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: torfree.general
Article #71

Re: Was it right?

#71
From: Jordan Blanchard
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00
76 lines
3599 bytes
Well, You must look at who's part of the vancouver freenet Board.. and 
old friend of many of the TFN Board mambers, Mr. Ed. Carrier.. He's done 
the say thing to a couple of friends of mine, and my sister's account.. 
He's the one that more or else putting Hate crap on about TFN.. 

Jason Arron Black (cj224@torfree.net) wrote: 

: The Vancouver community Net cut my account for posts I made to usenet :
I posted some articles that the VCN claimed was "Hate" : but since they
didn't have a rule against posting "hate" : they had a quicky meeting then
added a new rule to their user : aggreement addressing so called hate
speech. 

: Now, this is where it gets really Orwellian

: After the new rule was added, I stopped using my VCN account
: and put my email on forwarding, no more posts were made to usenet
: nor did I send any email...nothing at all

: Just a couple of days ago, I attemtpted to log onto my VCN account
: and was met with a message stating that my account was cut for 
: posting articles that are agianst the VCN user agreement rules.

: The problem is, the articles in question were posted *BEFORE*
: the new rule was added, and the VCN has decided to use it agianst me
: regardless of the fact that I heeded their warning that If I continued
: to post any questionable articles after the new rule was added
: I would have my account cut.


: should VCN or any freenet for that matter be able to create new rules
: and use them against you for things that were done or said
: before the rule was created?
: \

: For example:

: Someone posts his/her phone number on usenet asking for people to call 
: them for whatever reason.

: Then the Freenet decides that they no longer want people to use the system
: to post phone numbers to usenet.

: the Freenet issues a warning to the user that they don't want people
: doing that, even though there is nothing in the user agreement 
: saying no posting of phone numbers allowed.

: The user responds by telling the freenet that unless it's in the rules
: they will continue to post their phone number if they wish.

: The Freenet responds by having a board meeting to discuss it
: then comes up with a new rule stating that the freenet users are now
: no longer allowed to post phone numbers.
: and sends out a mass mailing to all users stating the new rule.


: The user hwo posted their phone number reads the new rule and stops
: posting any more phone numbers, thus obeying the freenet rules.


: Then the user after a few weeks attempts to log onto the freenet
: only to find that their account was cut, because they posted their phone 
: number in the past...evn though the rule against it never existed.

: Is the Freenet right or was the users account wrongfully terminated?





-- 
Jordan Blanchard
Web Site: Http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Boardwalk/1172/
Email Addresses: cy328@torfree.net 
		 SYSOP@TheLair.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <EMJBC6.ALw.0.bloor@torfree.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <EMHL97.KA.0.bloor@torfree.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 113d91,391f3d4344d926f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid113d91,public
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,391f3d4344d926f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public
X-Google-Thread: 103731,391f3d4344d926f7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103731,public
From: cy328@torfree.net (Jordan Blanchard)
Subject: Re: Was it right?
Date: 1998/01/09
Message-ID: <EMJBC6.ALw.0.bloor@torfree.net>
X-Deja-AN: 314434762
References: <EMHL97.KA.0.bloor@torfree.net>
Followup-To: torfree.general,bc.general,bc.politics
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Newsgroups: torfree.general,bc.general,bc.politics