🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: triangle.forsale
Article #1439

Re: (fwd) Re: *** Warning to Briggman Buyers ***

#1439
From: Dave Briggman
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00
36 lines
2814 bytes
Rodney Radford (sasrer@unx.sas.com) wrote:

: If I was to drop a sweater in a clothing store, I would get full refund
: for the sweater (if it wasn't dirty) since I have not damaged it. If I
: dropped a vase and it shattered, then your logic would be correct. So the
: issue is not whether the item was dropped, but whether the buyer damaged
: the merchandise. My point earlier is that there is a very slim chance that
: dropping the SIMMs would damage them. 

Since the SIMMS were NEW, and the buyer dropped them, chances are a lot better
that the buyer zipped the SIMMS.
 
: Btw, the original posting was not cancelled by the poster at *my* site. And
: I was only trying to point out from the view of someone who has worked with
: lots of chips/simms before, designing/building/fixing/upgrading computers
: that dropping a SIMM and it later being bad is not proof that dropping it was
: the cause of the problem. In fact, it is much more likely the SIMMs were
: damaged in other ways by the seller or the buyer. In fact, I even listed more
: plausible ways the SIMMs could be damaged and still be the buyers fault, so 
: I am not trying to place blame, just point out what I consider a major fault
: in your argument that it is not your fault.

The basic point I was TRYING to get across was that the buyer dropped the SIMMS
and that the SIMMS were covered by the manufacturer's LIFETIME warranty,
however the buyer didn't wish to go that route, instead he wanted his money
back, which I politely REFUSED...however, I did offer the pay for the FEDEX
shipping to the manufacturer for the buyer and called and got the manufacturer
to call him with an RMA and he (the buyer) is apparently going to ship it to CT
on Thursday.

Situation RESOLVED, except I am pissed because this hit the net and although
the posting was cancelled, some people are wanting the original poster to
re-hash the whole thing. The net result is - the buyer did exactly what I
offered almost a week ago.

Dave 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4b9rrc$30v@redstone.interpath.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <199512191733.MAA08398@mercury.interpath.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951219123550.4072W-100000@jefferson.ee.duke.edu> <sasrer.819398957@sas.com> <4b7c78$hfb@redstone.interpath.net> <sasrer.819472612@sas.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10baf4,fc648a1397ae0218
X-Google-Attributes: gid10baf4,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cf22,fc648a1397ae0218
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf22,public
From: paradigm@mercury.interpath.net (Dave Briggman)
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: *** Warning to Briggman Buyers ***
Date: 1995/12/20
Message-ID: <4b9rrc$30v@redstone.interpath.net>
X-Deja-AN: 122813201
references: <199512191733.MAA08398@mercury.interpath.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951219123550.4072W-100000@jefferson.ee.duke.edu> <sasrer.819398957@sas.com> <4b7c78$hfb@redstone.interpath.net> <sasrer.819472612@sas.com>
followup-to: triangle.forsale,dc.forsale.computers
organization: Interpath -- Providing Internet access to North Carolina
newsgroups: triangle.forsale,dc.forsale.computers