Article View: tx.general
Article #304Re: Caller-ID modem (was Re: repost from comp.dcom.telecom
From: Doug Davis
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 16:00
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 16:00
14 lines
1429 bytes
1429 bytes
In article <C0GIpt.12LB@austin.ibm.com> linas@boardhead.austin.ibm.com writes: >Hmmm... interesting idea ... but isn't the debate supposed to be about >"Caller ID" vs. "Calling Number ID"? What if you are blocking an >emergency phone call from your wife/freind/lover/etc who finds >themselves marooned at a poorly lit phone both on east 12th St? >Unless you don't care about having to explain why you didn't answer that >call during deep space 9, its not a good idea. Actually my wife/friend/lover/etc being simi-telcom literate would have called my Voice*Mail number, left a long and drawn out explaination (you know, the kind only a wife can) of what the problem was, where she was, how pissed she was ...etc. Them punched in the emergency code forcing it to ring my pager, call the cell phone, call the house line line etc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan7.160035.20551@seas.smu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!dougReferences:
<1993Jan05.040542.25904@chinacat.unicom.com> <1993Jan6.154210.21259@seas.smu.edu> <C0GIpt.12LB@austin.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: tx.general,austin.talk Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!doug From: doug@seas.smu.edu (Doug Davis) Subject: Re: Caller-ID modem (was Re: repost from comp.dcom.telecom Message-ID: <1993Jan7.160035.20551@seas.smu.edu> Sender: news@seas.smu.edu (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: turbo_f.seas.smu.edu Organization: SMU - School of Engineering & Applied Science - Dallas References: <1993Jan05.040542.25904@chinacat.unicom.com> <1993Jan6.154210.21259@seas.smu.edu> <C0GIpt.12LB@austin.ibm.com> Distribution: tx Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:00:35 GMT Lines: 16