Article View: tx.general
Article #3238Re: Bikes (was Re: GUN CONTROL)
From: Andrew Laska
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 04:08
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 04:08
35 lines
3177 bytes
3177 bytes
Norman Richards (orb@bashful.cc.utexas.edu) wrote: : There is nothing unsafe about riding on the sidewalk. There is potential : unsafeness jsut as there is that same potential on the street. The problem : is that some (ignorant) bikers choose to rise on the sidewalk in the same : manner as they ride on the street. This is incorrect. The Commerce Dept study which I paraphrased earlier in the thread disagrees with you. It found those using the sidewalk were statistically more likely to be involved in accidents. Actually by "less safe" one should not assume "not safe." I don't remember the actual numbers in the study but the difference was enough to help me in my decision to avoid sidewalks. Also, it pointed out that almost all sidewalk accidents were generally at intersections or driveways. In my experience this made sense because when I used to use the sidewalk I felt less comfortable at intersections than using the street at the same intersection. : I have no problem with the law requiring me to ride safely. I do have a : problem with the law telling me I cannot use a particular route when it is : both well-suited and safe for me to do so. On that note I think it is just STUPID to have a moving vehicle on a pedstrian walkway. Its like walking in the street!!! One issue is predictibility. When operating a vehicle you are supposed to behave in a specific manner not necessarily because its safe to do so but because others will be able to predict your behaviour. If one strays from this behaviour then the other drivers (or riders) will see this and watch out because you have strayed from the given behaviour. That is why we change one lane at a time, stop at a stop sign when nobody is around and signal for seemingly innocuous lane changes. If you get to ride on the sidewalk and are allowed to use your 'best judgement' then you are unpredictible to pedestrians and other vehicles and the atmosphere is less safe. Andrew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<laskaCzE8tu.F97@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!cs.utexas.edu!news.unt.edu!hermes.oc.com!news.kei.com!uhog.mit.edu!sgiblab!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!laskaReferences:
<39r0m3$h1k@oak.zilker.net> <D.Nash-1511941235440001@bubba.ots.utexas.edu> <3ab1jc$g4s@bashful.cc.utexas.edu> <D.Nash-1511941425170001@bubba.ots.utexas.edu> <3aba80$1t7@bashful.cc.utexas.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,642977eedb6b415e X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public X-Google-Thread: 103916,642977eedb6b415e X-Google-Attributes: gid103916,public X-Google-Thread: fd714,44a840f94edd3e03 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd714,public X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,faf138bd852a6ce6 X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-16 20:36:42 PST Newsgroups: tx.general,dfw.general,austin.general,tx.politics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!cs.utexas.edu!news.unt.edu!hermes.oc.com!news.kei.com!uhog.mit.edu!sgiblab!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!laska From: laska@netcom.com (Andrew Laska) Subject: Re: Bikes (was Re: GUN CONTROL) Message-ID: <laskaCzE8tu.F97@netcom.com> Followup-To: tx.general,dfw.general,austin.general,tx.politics Organization: Skippy the Wonder Dead Cow X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <39r0m3$h1k@oak.zilker.net> <D.Nash-1511941235440001@bubba.ots.utexas.edu> <3ab1jc$g4s@bashful.cc.utexas.edu> <D.Nash-1511941425170001@bubba.ots.utexas.edu> <3aba80$1t7@bashful.cc.utexas.edu> Distribution: tx Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 04:08:17 GMT Lines: 37