Thread View: ucla.dance
25 messages
25 total messages
Started by Technophile
Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00
urlz towards geekdom
Author: Technophile
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 00:00
46 lines
1633 bytes
1633 bytes
I'd like to start a "baby steps" to becoming a geek page for dancers. Anyone care to share their thoughts on the following URL's http://www.stars.com http://www.inquiry.com/techtips/web_pro/ http://www.inquiry.com/techtips/vrml_pro/ http://www.whatis.com/ http://WWW.Stars.com/Authoring/HTML/Primers/index.html http://www.worldvillage.com/kidz/htmlhelp.htm (note: this is really basic here.... meant for kids) http://www.geocities.com/Athens/1290 HTML Writers Guild at http://www.hwg.org for those just getting on the web: http://www.siliconvalleygirl.org Arts Wire's SpiderSchool http://www.artswire.org/spiderschool ~ the dnc project http://www.websciences.org/dnc/ dance, networks, computing
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: vikki sitthideth
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
25 lines
1907 bytes
1907 bytes
JCDill wrote: > > :Technophile <public@internet.com> mentions: > > >I'd like to start a "baby steps" to becoming a geek page for dancers. > > > > In case you haven't noticed, most dancers who are reading newsgroups > don't need any special help in being a geek. (Me included) > > There are plenty of resources on how to create webpages, this has > nothing to do with dancing and your resource seems redundant, and > apparently not of much interest in the newsgroups you are posting in, > in that no one is following up on your messages. > > I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of > the interest in your project... > -- > > My first name has 2 letters, There's only one letter "J". > My last name's a bit longer, It just worked out that way. > I hate spam, and UCE, and all that unwanted mess. > So to reply, you have to edit my return address. I am interested in receiving the top ten dance chart
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Nobody
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
18 lines
1594 bytes
1594 bytes
On Thu, 01 May 1997 22:36:08 GMT, jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com (JCDill) wrote: >:Technophile <public@internet.com> mentions: > >>I'd like to start a "baby steps" to becoming a geek page for dancers. >> > >In case you haven't noticed, most dancers who are reading newsgroups >don't need any special help in being a geek. (Me included) > >There are plenty of resources on how to create webpages, this has >nothing to do with dancing and your resource seems redundant, and >apparently not of much interest in the newsgroups you are posting in, >in that no one is following up on your messages. One suggested site: http://www.outer.net/html4dum/contents.htm
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Technophile
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
48 lines
2513 bytes
2513 bytes
JCDill wrote:
>
> :Technophile <public@internet.com> mentions:
>
> >I'd like to start a "baby steps" to becoming a geek page for dancers.
> >
>
> In case you haven't noticed, most dancers who are reading newsgroups
> don't need any special help in being a geek. (Me included)
By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all.
The point of the post was not for the one's that are there, rather
suggestions from those who got there as to what resources where useful
to them in the process.
>
> There are plenty of resources on how to create webpages, this has
> nothing to do with dancing and your resource seems redundant, and
> apparently not of much interest in the newsgroups you are posting in,
> in that no one is following up on your messages.
By far, most of what is on the web is crap. The point of such lists is
to filter these choices down to a manageble level for those comming in.
>
> I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of
> the interest in your project...
> --
I get a lot a positive e-mail about my project as well as ~ 50,000
accesses a month. But your right, if the 200 or 300 people that read
these dance newsgroups don't respond to a question then i should
certainly abandon all hope.
regards
~ the dnc project
http://www.websciences.org/dnc/
dance, networks, computing
In Paris They simply stared when I spoke to them in French; I never
did succeed in making those idiots understand their own language.
Mark Twain, The Innocent Abroad, 1869
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: JCDill
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00
22 lines
1718 bytes
1718 bytes
:Technophile <public@internet.com> mentions: >I'd like to start a "baby steps" to becoming a geek page for dancers. > In case you haven't noticed, most dancers who are reading newsgroups don't need any special help in being a geek. (Me included) There are plenty of resources on how to create webpages, this has nothing to do with dancing and your resource seems redundant, and apparently not of much interest in the newsgroups you are posting in, in that no one is following up on your messages. I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of the interest in your project... -- My first name has 2 letters, There's only one letter "J". My last name's a bit longer, It just worked out that way. I hate spam, and UCE, and all that unwanted mess. So to reply, you have to edit my return address.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: JCDill
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
29 lines
2150 bytes
2150 bytes
:Technophile <dnc@geocities.com> mentions: JC said: >> I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of >> the interest in your project... >I get a lot a positive e-mail about my project as well as ~ 50,000 >accesses a month. But your right, if the 200 or 300 people that read >these dance newsgroups don't respond to a question then i should >certainly abandon all hope. No, what I said is that if you don't get any follow-ups, you should consider that indicative of the interest in your posts. Implied was that you thus might want to stop repeatedly posting. Your posts are not about dance, and dancers aren't posting follow-ups. Thus, perhaps, your posts in these dance newsgroups are out of place and shouldn't be repeated. Now, if there ARE dancers that find your posts of interest and pertinent to these dance newsgroups, and they post opinions of such, of course then there *would* be interest. So far, I haven't seen it. -- My first name has 2 letters, There's only one letter "J". My last name's a bit longer, It just worked out that way. I hate spam, and UCE, and all that unwanted mess. So to reply, you have to edit my return address.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Ed Jay
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
50 lines
2718 bytes
2718 bytes
Joan, it hardly seems like a month has gone by since your last tirade, but here you are once again on time in your fantasy roll as net cop. Have you considered periodic doses of Prozac? Perhaps a hormone fix? jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com (Joan Dill) wrote: >>> I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of >>> the interest in your project... > >:Technophile <dnc@geocities.com> mentions: >> >>I get a lot a positive e-mail about my project as well as ~ 50,000 >>accesses a month...<snip> > >Joan said: > >No, what I said is that if you don't get any follow-ups, you should >consider that indicative of the interest in your posts. Joan, I don't suppose in your fervor to attack you realize you are the one continuing to respond to the gentlemens post. > >Implied was that you thus might want to stop repeatedly posting. Your >posts are not about dance, and dancers aren't posting follow-ups. >Thus, perhaps, your posts in these dance newsgroups are out of place >and shouldn't be repeated. Joan, are your posts concerned about dance? Is this one? > >Now, if there ARE dancers that find your posts of interest and >pertinent to these dance newsgroups, and they post opinions of such, >of course then there *would* be interest. Joan, you seem to be so hell-bent on attacking the windmills of your inane and outrageous 'mission,' I'd be suprised if you'd recognize anyone elses interests. >So far, I haven't seen it. The blind rarely see. Joan, it's time to take about a one-week break from the Net. Hope you feel better. Ed c];^? Salto ergo sum, in saltatus veritas. My return address is disguised. Remove the leading X to reply.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: JCDill
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
16 lines
1473 bytes
1473 bytes
Would all you "wonderful lovely people" please STOP USING A NAME THAT I STOPPED USING OVER 5 YEARS AGO AND DO NOT WANT TO BE CALLED?????? sheesh. My name is JC. Please do not call me by any other name, again. jc -- My first name has 2 letters, There's only one letter "J". My last name's a bit longer, It just worked out that way. I hate spam, and UCE, and all that unwanted mess. So to reply, you have to edit my return address.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: mark anthony balzer
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
36 lines
2412 bytes
2412 bytes
What's wrong Joan; did you get tired of kicking your dog again? Leave this poor guy alone. Go save the 'net on some other planet. JCDill <jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >:Technophile <dnc@geocities.com> mentions: > >JC said: >>> I would suggest you consider the lack of follow-ups as indicative of >>> the interest in your project... > >>I get a lot a positive e-mail about my project as well as ~ 50,000 >>accesses a month. But your right, if the 200 or 300 people that read >>these dance newsgroups don't respond to a question then i should >>certainly abandon all hope. > >No, what I said is that if you don't get any follow-ups, you should >consider that indicative of the interest in your posts. > >Implied was that you thus might want to stop repeatedly posting. Your >posts are not about dance, and dancers aren't posting follow-ups. >Thus, perhaps, your posts in these dance newsgroups are out of place >and shouldn't be repeated. > >Now, if there ARE dancers that find your posts of interest and >pertinent to these dance newsgroups, and they post opinions of such, >of course then there *would* be interest. So far, I haven't seen it. >-- > >My first name has 2 letters, There's only one letter "J". >My last name's a bit longer, It just worked out that way. >I hate spam, and UCE, and all that unwanted mess. >So to reply, you have to edit my return address.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: donna
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
11 lines
1201 bytes
1201 bytes
Technophile wrote: > > By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all. > Oooohhh, I beg to differ. Shall we kick off a discussion on how many engineers, scientists, computer programmers/analysts, and technoholics are dancers? Donna
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Technophile
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
40 lines
1922 bytes
1922 bytes
donna@cmartinvideo.com wrote:
>
> Technophile wrote:
> >
> > By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all.
> >
>
> Oooohhh, I beg to differ. Shall we kick off a discussion on how many
> engineers, scientists, computer programmers/analysts, and technoholics
> are dancers?
>
> Donna
Pleeezzzzzzeee do. At the dance dept. here at UCLA more administrative
staff than faculty have e-mail. Very few use the web.
It's my personal experience that the majority of people that i take
class with don't know what a URL is.
Your experience i take it is different?
p.s. Pardone. If this discussion is not "related to dance."
~ the dnc project
http://www.websciences.org/dnc/
dance, networks, computing
To dance is to be out of yourself. Larger, more beautiful,
more powerful. This is power, it is glory on earth and it is
yours for the taking.
-Agnes De Mille
aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Technophile
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00
40 lines
1916 bytes
1916 bytes
donna@cmartinvideo.com wrote:
>
> Technophile wrote:
> >
> > By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all.
> >
>
> Oooohhh, I beg to differ. Shall we kick off a discussion on how many
> engineers, scientists, computer programmers/analysts, and technoholics
> are dancers?
>
> Donna
Pleeezzzzzzeee do. At the dance dept. here at UCLA more administrative
staff than faculty have e-mail. Very few use the web.
It's my personal experience that the majority of people that i take
class with don't know what a URL is.
Your experience i take it is different?
p.s. Pardone. If this discussion is not "related to dance."
~ the dnc project
http://www.websciences.org/dnc/
dance, networks, computing
To dance is to be out of yourself. Larger, more beautiful,
more powerful. This is power, it is glory on earth and it is
yours for the taking.
-Agnes De Mille
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Ed Jay
Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 00:00
19 lines
1578 bytes
1578 bytes
jjjjcdill@ix.netcom.com (JCDill) wrote: >Would all you "wonderful lovely people" please STOP USING A NAME THAT >I STOPPED USING OVER 5 YEARS AGO AND DO NOT WANT TO BE CALLED?????? > >sheesh. > >My name is JC. Please do not call me by any other name, again. > >jc >-- Frankly, Joan, you have me a bit confused. Is it JC, jc, jjjjcdill, Officer Krupke, or Mark Furman? Ed c];^) Bibo ergo sum. In vino veritas. My return address is disguised. Remove the leading X to reply.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: William R. Mattil
Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 00:00
15 lines
1311 bytes
1311 bytes
Ed Jay wrote: > > Officer Krupke, or Mark Furman? > This is truely funny! Thanks.... Bill -- William R. Mattil wrmattil@ix.netcom.com (972) 256-3219
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Rima Cooke
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00
16 lines
1418 bytes
1418 bytes
In <336AA996.6366@cmartinvideo.com> donna@cmartinvideo.com writes: > >Technophile wrote: >> >> By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all. >> > >Oooohhh, I beg to differ. Shall we kick off a discussion on how many >engineers, scientists, computer programmers/analysts, and technoholics >are dancers? > >Donna We already had a poll here and got quite a few responses. Enough said.
Re: urlz towards geekdom
Author: Technophile
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00
37 lines
1745 bytes
1745 bytes
Rima Cooke wrote: > > In <336AA996.6366@cmartinvideo.com> donna@cmartinvideo.com writes: > > > >Technophile wrote: > >> > >> By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all. > >> > > > >Oooohhh, I beg to differ. Shall we kick off a discussion on how many > >engineers, scientists, computer programmers/analysts, and technoholics > > >are dancers? > > > >Donna > > We already had a poll here and got quite a few responses. Enough said. aaaahhhhh, the spirit of discussion. And the poll asked what? The results of that poll were? ~ the dnc project http://www.websciences.org/dnc/ dance, networks, computing Neither birth nor sex forms a limit to genius. Charlotte Bronte
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Bill Harwood
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 May 1997 00:00
44 lines
2157 bytes
2157 bytes
Technophile wrote: > > donna@cmartinvideo.com wrote: > > > > Technophile wrote: > > > > > > By far most dancers don't use computers effectively or at all. > > > > > > > Oooohhh, I beg to differ. Shall we kick off a discussion on how many > > engineers, scientists, computer programmers/analysts, and technoholics > > are dancers? > > > > Donna > > Pleeezzzzzzeee do. At the dance dept. here at UCLA more administrative > staff than faculty have e-mail. Very few use the web. > > It's my personal experience that the majority of people that i take > class with don't know what a URL is. > > Your experience i take it is different? > > p.s. Pardone. If this discussion is not "related to dance." > > ~ the dnc project > > http://www.websciences.org/dnc/ > > dance, networks, computing > > To dance is to be out of yourself. Larger, more beautiful, > more powerful. This is power, it is glory on earth and it is > yours for the taking. > -Agnes De Mille I propose that we let VICTOR handle this one. Bill Harwood W5WH one of them dancin engineers and I do se habla URL :)
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Mary Lou Knack
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00
5 lines
1164 bytes
1164 bytes
Once again I fall outside the stereotypes - I am a FEMALE dancing engineer. Will I ever find my cubbyhole ;) -- Mary Lou Knack <mlknack@bbn.com>
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Iconoclast
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00
10 lines
1415 bytes
1415 bytes
On Mon, 05 May 1997 12:40:38 -0400, mlknack@bbn.com (Mary Lou Knack) wrote: >Once again I fall outside the stereotypes - I am a FEMALE dancing >engineer. Will I ever find my cubbyhole ;) >-- >Mary Lou Knack <mlknack@bbn.com> Sure, but there might be a lot of GUYS in it!!
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Technophile
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 05 May 1997 00:00
28 lines
1562 bytes
1562 bytes
Mary Lou Knack wrote: > > Once again I fall outside the stereotypes - I am a FEMALE dancing > engineer. Will I ever find my cubbyhole ;) > -- > Mary Lou Knack <mlknack@bbn.com> >I am a FEMALE dancing engineer. Coool. > Will I ever find my cubbyhole. probably not. = ) ~ the dnc project http://www.websciences.org/dnc/ dance, networks, computing Neither birth nor sex forms a limit to genius. Charlotte Bronte
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 00:00
27 lines
1870 bytes
1870 bytes
Technophile wrote in alt.arts.ballet: >Mary Lou Knack wrote: >> >> Once again I fall outside the stereotypes - I am a FEMALE dancing >> engineer. Will I ever find my cubbyhole ;) >> -- >> Mary Lou Knack <mlknack@bbn.com> > >>I am a FEMALE dancing engineer. > >Coool. > >> Will I ever find my cubbyhole. > >probably not. = ) But at least she won't be afraid to stop and ask for directions. :-) -------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, �227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms.
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Iconoclast
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 00:00
11 lines
1531 bytes
1531 bytes
On Tue, 06 May 1997 06:18:53 GMT, postmaster@127.0.0.1 (Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin) wrote: >But at least she won't be afraid to stop and ask for directions. > > :-) Wait a minute. Female engineers do not necessarily represent their sex. They may be the ones that are "different", and that may mean they WON'T ask for directions!
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: The Consultant
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 00:00
30 lines
2041 bytes
2041 bytes
I doubt it - <uppity>Women are generally more sensible than men in this regard because we've never be taught it is "unwomanly" to ask a question</uppity> However - for those women who have bought into the idea that they can Never Be Wrong, and other generally masculine ideas, it is a distinct possibility. M In article <336f7d79.361076950@news.PioneerPlanet.infi.net>, Iconoclast <iconoclast@truth.courage.principle.net> wrote: >On Tue, 06 May 1997 06:18:53 GMT, postmaster@127.0.0.1 (Warrl kyree >Tale'sedrin) wrote: > >>But at least she won't be afraid to stop and ask for directions. >> >> :-) > >Wait a minute. Female engineers do not necessarily represent their >sex. They may be the ones that are "different", and that may mean they >WON'T ask for directions! -- Melissa McDowell | Griffin Digital Consultants, Inc. "Chakaal the Consultant" | 301 982 1292 vox / 301 982 2055 fax chakaal@access.digex.net | www.datanetinc.com/griffin www.access.digex.net/~chakaal | Web Development Professionals
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: Nicholas Brown
Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00
31 lines
1902 bytes
1902 bytes
Technophile wrote: > > Mary Lou Knack wrote: > > > > Once again I fall outside the stereotypes - I am a FEMALE dancing > > engineer. Will I ever find my cubbyhole ;) > > -- > > Mary Lou Knack <mlknack@bbn.com> > > >I am a FEMALE dancing engineer. > > Coool. > > > Will I ever find my cubbyhole. > > probably not. = ) > > ~ the dnc project > > http://www.websciences.org/dnc/ > > dance, networks, computing > > Neither birth nor sex forms a limit to genius. > > Charlotte Bronte Another dancing Engineer ? Great, what field (Elect, Mech or Comp Sci ?) Dancing Engineers will have a hard time finding their cubbyhole. Most engineers don't dance, so it's hard leaving work in time to get to a class.
Re: aRe DanCeRs GeEks?
Author: amy beth pummill
Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 00:00
22 lines
1919 bytes
1919 bytes
On Wed, 7 May 1997, Nicholas Brown wrote: > > > > Mary Lou Knack wrote: > > > > > > Once again I fall outside the stereotypes - I am a FEMALE dancing > > > engineer. Will I ever find my cubbyhole ;) > > > -- > > > Mary Lou Knack <mlknack@bbn.com> > > > > >I am a FEMALE dancing engineer. > > > Another dancing Engineer ? Great, what field (Elect, Mech or Comp Sci ?) > Dancing Engineers will have a hard time finding their cubbyhole. Most > engineers don't dance, so it's hard leaving work in time to get to a > class. > > geeze, you've never been to the University of Illinois, have you? a very very large number of Dancing Illini are engineers! we're surrounded by them! amy :-)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads