🚀 go-pugleaf

loughnan@dircon.co.uk (John Loughnan) wrote:

>In article <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk>, leelaslk@vax.sbu.ac.uk says...
>>
>>Does anyone have any good or bad experiences with the US Robotics
>>Sportster Vi 28,800 modem ?.
>>
>>Thanks for any info.
>>
>>Lasitha
>>-- 
>>Lasitha Leelasena               
>>Systems & Software Engineer
>>South Bank University, London
>>E-mail:Lasitha.Leelasena@sbu.ac.uk
>I do not know if it counts but I have been
>using this modem for a couple of weeks now 
>and have had no problems with it.
>I think it is very good.

>John
Hi
Unfortunatly I purchased 1 of these bits of junk to use with my
notebook while mobile. I wanted to use the software I use in the
office. Trumpet Winsock Bitcom & Bitfax. Bitcom and Trumpet works fine
but I use the fax more and Bitfax  will not work nor will any other
fax software other than the supplied interlink crap. I am fed up
trying to get Robotics to admiit they have a problem. The last straw
was when 1 of their engineeers told me that the Sportser V34 was type
2.0 compliant but not 2 compliant same applied to type 1.0 and 1.
If you just want to access the net its fine but if you need to fax
forget it
Bye


Roger Burgess Tel. +44 (0)1243 785325
              Fax  +44 (0)1243 771061
              Mobile +44 (0)383 950320
              e-mail roger@burgess.nildram.co.uk