Article View: uk.comp.misc
Article #15Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?
From: bill davidsen
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:43
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:43
16 lines
1205 bytes
1205 bytes
In article <4ifedt$hi0@linux.nildram.co.uk>, Roger SS Burgess <roger@burgess.nildram.co.uk> wrote: | was when 1 of their engineeers told me that the Sportser V34 was type | 2.0 compliant but not 2 compliant same applied to type 1.0 and 1. | If you just want to access the net its fine but if you need to fax | forget it What's the problem with that, other than that the people who named the standards were on drugs? 2 and 2.0 are not the same, and decent fax software should support both. Of all the bad things about the modem, this doesn't seem to be a problem. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "As a software development model, Anarchy does not scale well." -Dave Welch
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ingrl$1usq@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!darkstar.prodigy.com!davidsenReferences:
<31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk> <4ifedt$hi0@linux.nildram.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!darkstar.prodigy.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc,uk.net,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ? Date: 19 Mar 1996 23:43:49 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: <4ingrl$1usq@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk> <4ifedt$hi0@linux.nildram.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: darkstar.prodigy.com Originator: davidsen@darkstar.prodigy.com