Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ? - Article 3 - go-pugleaf

Article View: uk.comp.misc

Article #3

Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?

From: Donna Forosisky
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 17:39

25 lines
1267 bytes

In article <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk>, loughnan@dircon.co.uk 
says...
>
>In article <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk>, leelaslk@vax.sbu.ac.uk 
says...
>>
>>Does anyone have any good or bad experiences with the US Robotics
>>Sportster Vi 28,800 modem ?.
>>
>>Thanks for any info.
>>
>>Lasitha
>>-- 
>>Lasitha Leelasena               
>>Systems & Software Engineer
>>South Bank University, London
>>E-mail:Lasitha.Leelasena@sbu.ac.uk

I've had problems with mine--drops carrier, won't allow binary 
transfers, etc.  I've read a lot of very bad things on compuserve about 
their (USR's) recent "bad" customer service, also.  

The sad thing is that I've always had good luck with their modems in the 
past...back in the old days up until the 14.4s...the 28.8s well?  Just 
be sure to get the latest revisions of everything!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4hsfnm$kom@news.enter.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.enter.net!usenet

References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.enter.net!usenet
From: frisk@enter.net (Donna Forosisky)
Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc,uk.net,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?
Date: 9 Mar 1996 17:39:02 GMT
Organization: PRSM Systems
Message-ID: <4hsfnm$kom@news.enter.net>
References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp71.enter.net
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.4

Reply to Parent Message