Thread View: uk.comp.misc
15 messages
15 total messages
Started by Andy Mabbett
Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
15 lines
1290 bytes
1290 bytes
A non- PC friendly acquaintance of mine had a virus warning from his scanning software, and followed its helpful advice to "delete mueexe.exe"; now he can't run any *.exe file in Win 98. It's gone from his recycle bin; can he restore it any other way, without reinstalling Windows? I can't seem to find such a file on my machine at all- where is it hidden? -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Harry Broomhall
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
27 lines
1850 bytes
1850 bytes
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000 13:56:48 +0100, Andy Mabbett
<andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>A non- PC friendly acquaintance of mine had a virus warning from his
>scanning software, and followed its helpful advice to "delete
>mueexe.exe"; now he can't run any *.exe file in Win 98.
>
>It's gone from his recycle bin; can he restore it any other way, without
>reinstalling Windows?
>
>I can't seem to find such a file on my machine at all- where is it
>hidden?
It's not on my machine either. Which leads me to the conclusion
that it isn't required to be available under Windows, which I kind-of
expected anyway.
If you cant run *any* .exe file then Windows simply will not start.
Which leads me to feel that the problem may not be as stated.
I assume you haven't seen said machine to verify the exact problem,
so in your place I'd either go and see it, or if not practical, point
the owner at his dealer, or entice a more accurate description of the
fault from him/her.
Regards,
Harry.
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
30 lines
2079 bytes
2079 bytes
In article <41lcessf3a5kukrim25p2oudk5rf4plgte@4ax.com>, Harry Broomhall <haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk> writes > If you cant run *any* .exe file then Windows simply will not start. >Which leads me to feel that the problem may not be as stated. Windows starts , but attempting to run anything including Win Explorer, OE, etc al) brings up a Windows dialogue saying something to the effect "mueexe.exe not found; needed for file association .exe", and asking to be told where the file is located. That, though has set me wondering - I wonder if that was the virus, and it had set an association for all .exe files, to itself. My machine doe snot seem to have an association for .exe - how would I remove one from my friends machine, If I can't open Explorer? > I assume you haven't seen said machine to verify the exact problem, >so in your place I'd either go and see it, I did - see above. >or if not practical, point >the owner at his dealer, His dealer told him to reinstall windows, loosing all his data - which is not backed up :-( -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: 'Dungeon' Dave
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
38 lines
2372 bytes
2372 bytes
.. and it came to pass that Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.d emon.co.uk> uttered forth: >In article <41lcessf3a5kukrim25p2oudk5rf4plgte@4ax.com>, Harry >Broomhall ><haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk> writes >> If you cant run *any* .exe file then Windows simply will not start. >>Which leads me to feel that the problem may not be as stated. > >Windows starts , but attempting to run anything including Win Explorer, >OE, etc al) brings up a Windows dialogue saying something to the effect >"mueexe.exe not found; needed for file association .exe", and asking to >be told where the file is located. I don't suppose that this is an anti-virus scanning program, is it? Something set in the registry to scan executables on launch, and the reg can't find this particular app when calling a scanner. Just a thought. If this is the case, try performing a find in the registry for this filename - the reg or hive key may give some clue to its purpose or origin. <snip> > >His dealer told him to reinstall windows, loosing all his data - which >is not backed up :-( A reinstall of Windoze (over an existing version) doesn't actually cause a loss of data, unless it attempts to create a "My Documents" folder and - finding one - overwrites everything with a blank folder.... does it? It should be possible to archive the data onto another disk or folder at least to have a backup. -- "Dungeon" Dave, in anti-harvest mode... From: abuse@yahoo.com From: abuse@btinternet.com From: *@localhost
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
35 lines
2259 bytes
2259 bytes
In article <SHc7odAZDn54EwCR@ghastly.demon.co.uk>, 'Dungeon' Dave <Dungeon@SpamNot.Here> writes >I don't suppose that this is an anti-virus scanning program, is it? Pass - he wasn't even able to tell me which one he'd been using :-( >If this is the case, try performing a find in the registry for this >filename - the reg or hive key may give some clue to its purpose or >origin. How, please - I've never dabbled with a registry before. >>His dealer told him to reinstall windows, loosing all his data - which >>is not backed up :-( > >A reinstall of Windoze (over an existing version) It' snot simply a case of reinstalling Windows; he's got a Hewlet Packard, with CD which will, apparently, return the machine to "as new" condition. >doesn't actually >cause a loss of data, unless it attempts to create a "My >Documents" folder and - finding one - overwrites everything with a >blank folder.... does it? It should be possible to archive the data >onto another disk or folder at least to have a backup. Worth a try; thanks - he's also got mail, and addresses in OE (which I've never used), how could these be preserved? -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Marcus Durham
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00
17 lines
1437 bytes
1437 bytes
In article <MEPrAtJaUm54Ewxr@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> shared the following with us in demon.tech.pc: [snip] >His dealer told him to reinstall windows, loosing all his data - which >is not backed up :-( [snip] As a last resort reinstall Windows over the top of the broken copy. All settings should be retained, and all broken files fixed as long as you pay attention to when it says it's about to replace a file with an older copy. -- Marcus Durham The UMTSDW Homepage. News, Reviews, Features and Locations. http://www.zenn.demon.co.uk/drwho/drwho.htm
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
38 lines
2088 bytes
2088 bytes
In article <zzFF4.6513$Q5.23128@stones>, William Allen <mail@mayfly13.fsnet.co.uk> writes >Do this: [...] >====== >REGEDIT4 > > >[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shell\open\command] >@="\"%1\" %*" >====== > >This file should rebuild enough of the EXE association to get EXEs >working Sadly not; though the other solution offered elsewhere in this thread fixed that problem. [...] >Now you have to start clearing up the mess the >trojan left. You could try an AV scanner to do this (**NOT** the one >that got you in this mess), Norton (which was the software use din this case) now reports that Subseven is still infecting c:\WINDOWS\MSREXE.EXE, which it cannot fix; it recommends deleting this file. The file cannot be deleted (nor even renamed, as a backup) as it is "in use by Windows". Will Sophos Sweep fix it (I won't have chance to try that until tomorrow night), or is there some other solution. >or email me for more details. Thanks again - copy e-mailed. -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
18 lines
1514 bytes
1514 bytes
In article <oetjIBAVzy54EwVQ@tgmead.demon.co.uk>, Tom <tom@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes >Below is the file of exported entries which deal with .exe files from my >registry. This has fixed the association problem; so the machine can be used. Thank you again. However, as described in anther post, the Trojan still appears to be present :-( Now, if someone can just advise on fixing my CD/ DVD drive... -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Tom
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
42 lines
2121 bytes
2121 bytes
In article <s7JTvIBA9754EwGe@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk>, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> writes >In article <zzFF4.6513$Q5.23128@stones>, William Allen ><mail@mayfly13.fsnet.co.uk> writes <snip> >>Now you have to start clearing up the mess the >>trojan left. You could try an AV scanner to do this (**NOT** the one >>that got you in this mess), > >Norton (which was the software use din this case) now reports that >Subseven is still infecting c:\WINDOWS\MSREXE.EXE, which it cannot fix; >it recommends deleting this file. The file cannot be deleted (nor even >renamed, as a backup) as it is "in use by Windows". Will Sophos Sweep >fix it (I won't have chance to try that until tomorrow night), or is >there some other solution. > You can delete anything at all from a native DOS prompt (i.e. when you boot into DOS rather than running it within Windows). Boot to DOS Prompt via control key enter: CD windows The file may be hidden, write protected etc, so unset the attributes: ATTRIB -H -S -R msrexe.exe Now, better safe than sorry, rename it: REN msrexe.exe msrexe.bad This way you can reverse the thing if necessary, but the file should probably be consigned to perdition.... <snip> -- Tom
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Tom
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
95 lines
3674 bytes
3674 bytes
In article <MEPrAtJaUm54Ewxr@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk>, Andy Mabbett
<andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <41lcessf3a5kukrim25p2oudk5rf4plgte@4ax.com>, Harry Broomhall
><haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk> writes
>> If you cant run *any* .exe file then Windows simply will not start.
>>Which leads me to feel that the problem may not be as stated.
>
>Windows starts , but attempting to run anything including Win Explorer,
>OE, etc al) brings up a Windows dialogue saying something to the effect
>"mueexe.exe not found; needed for file association .exe", and asking to
>be told where the file is located.
>
>That, though has set me wondering - I wonder if that was the virus, and
>it had set an association for all .exe files, to itself. My machine doe
>snot seem to have an association for .exe - how would I remove one from
>my friends machine, If I can't open Explorer?
Below is the file of exported entries which deal with .exe files from my
registry. Cut this from the line "REGEDIT4" to include the final line
@="%1", paste it into notepad and save it as "EXEFILE.REG. (Sorry -
this is a text group so I can't just attach it.
Copy it onto a floppy and then boot the failed machine into DOS using
control during booting and choosing "DOS Prompt Only" Copy the file on
to the root directory of the failed computer. Then type:
REGEDIT EXEFILE.REG
This will merge the new keys into the registry, overwriting the old
ones. Hopefully, that will fix the problem.
====Registry file Exefile.reg====Do not include this line====
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.exe]
"Content Type"="application/x-msdownload"
@="exefile"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile]
"EditFlags"=hex:d8,07,00,00
@="Application"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shell]
@=""
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shell\open]
@=""
"EditFlags"=hex:00,00,00,00
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shell\open\command]
@="\"%1\" %*"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shellex]
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers]
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\{86F19A00-42A0-
1069-A2E9-08002B30309D}]
@=""
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\exefile\DefaultIcon]
@="%1"
======End of registry file====Do not include this line===
>
If that fails, then you could try importing the default settings from
the file "system.1st". It takes a LONG time, but this is how to do it:
Boot to DOS by holding down control while powering up and selecting
"Command Prompt Only."
From the DOS prompt, issue the following commands:
CD/
REGEDIT /L:SYSTEM.1ST /E DEFAULT.REG
What this does is to take system.1st and create a text version which can
be merged into the system registry by the command:
REGEDIT DEFAULT.REG
This does take a long time and it will remove the pnp devices - when you
next boot they will be detected and reinstalled.
--
Tom
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 00:00
24 lines
1623 bytes
1623 bytes
In article <zzFF4.6513$Q5.23128@stones>, William Allen <mail@mayfly13.fsnet.co.uk> writes Thank you, all, very, very much - I'm off to attempt a fix now. > Now you have to start clearing up the mess the >trojan left. You could try an AV scanner to do this (**NOT** the one >that got you in this mess), I have Sweep; I'll try that > or email me for more details. (Copy of post e-mailed) >The dealer should be shot, shortly after your friend (for not backing >up - inexcusable)<G>. That's my second task ;-) -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: John Chapple
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00
19 lines
1530 bytes
1530 bytes
In article <pcSiWiCuC854EwU4@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk>, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> writes >In article <oetjIBAVzy54EwVQ@tgmead.demon.co.uk>, Tom ><tom@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes >>Below is the file of exported entries which deal with .exe files from my >>registry. > >This has fixed the association problem; so the machine can be used. >Thank you again. > >However, as described in anther post, the Trojan still appears to be >present :-( Go to www.moosoft.com & get a (free) time limited version of the Cleaner Well recommended by others (Evaluating at the moment) YMMV -- John Chapple
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Andy Mabbett
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00
31 lines
2278 bytes
2278 bytes
In article <tRNR3DAIl854Ew0V@tgmead.demon.co.uk>, Tom <tom@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes >The file may be hidden, write protected etc, so unset the attributes: > >ATTRIB -H -S -R msrexe.exe Not in this case. >Now, better safe than sorry, rename it: > >REN msrexe.exe msrexe.bad > >This way you can reverse the thing if necessary, but the file should >probably be consigned to perdition.... Safely removed; though there is no a warning on start-up that it cannot be found; I tried searching for it in the registry, and deleted (after backing up!) the only entry which mentioned it by name, something to do with Winload; but after a restart the message came up again, and the registry entry returned. Have I omitted to do something to remove it, or is it coming back from the, er backup? What do I do now? After removing the file, Norton reported the machine as clean; I then installed Sweep, which found three occurrences of it, in files called BAbypaul.bmp, but which Explorer said to b executables. Trying to delete these crashed explorer, but I finally deleted them from DOS. -- Andy Mabbett "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day; teach a man to fish, feed him for life" - Chinese proverb (500 B.C.) "Teach him to use the 'Net and he won't bother you for weeks." - Les King
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Harry Broomhall
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00
27 lines
2146 bytes
2146 bytes
In article <8ND3CuAk0N64EwfB@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk>,
Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> writes:
[SNIP]
>
> Safely removed; though there is no a warning on start-up that it cannot
> be found; I tried searching for it in the registry, and deleted (after
> backing up!) the only entry which mentioned it by name, something to do
> with Winload; but after a restart the message came up again, and the
> registry entry returned. Have I omitted to do something to remove it, or
> is it coming back from the, er backup? What do I do now?
I suspect (but I'm no expert on registry entries) that this may
be being reset by having an entry in the 'Load=' line in win.ini.
This is usualy in the first few lines of that file, under the
section header of [windows]. The line *usualy* reads just 'Load='
with nothing after it, but other programs may have set something there
as well. Look in the 'Run=' line as well.
On boot Win9x reads the 'compatability' older files win.ini and
system.ini, and puts the result in the registry.
Regards,
Harry.
Re: Win 98: mueexe.exe missing
Author: Digital.Antichrist
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00
35 lines
2154 bytes
2154 bytes
Hi,
I've had problems with Trojans and such-like in the past and I'm
sure that there'll probably be more trouble in the future. I've signed
up with McAfee's online anti-virus service and found it quite useful,
it's only about 20 dollars for a year's subscription. I use it nearly
every day. I also recommend popping along to
http://www.grc.com
as it has information on how to prevent your system becoming infected
and has a few pages on testing the security of your PC.
For extra security I suggest using a software based firewall. I'm
currently using Lockdown 2000 and Zone Labs' Zone Alarm.
In article <wR6MvUAAwE64EwO1@ch-w.demon.co.uk>, John Chapple <jc@ch-
w.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <pcSiWiCuC854EwU4@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk>, Andy Mabbett
><andy@pigsonthewing.demon.co.uk> writes
>>In article <oetjIBAVzy54EwVQ@tgmead.demon.co.uk>, Tom
>><tom@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes
>>>Below is the file of exported entries which deal with .exe files from my
>>>registry.
>>
>>This has fixed the association problem; so the machine can be used.
>>Thank you again.
>>
>>However, as described in anther post, the Trojan still appears to be
>>present :-(
>
>Go to www.moosoft.com & get a (free) time limited version of the Cleaner
>Well recommended by others
>(Evaluating at the moment)
>YMMV
--
Digital.Antichrist
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads