Article View: uk.comp.os.linux
Article #1187Re: Microsoft and obsolescence (was Re: KDE v. Gnome - don't you guys ever change subject lines when a thread goes off topic?)
From: M O'Neill
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 00:00
36 lines
2631 bytes
2631 bytes
On 2 Oct 1998 11:22:44 +1000, nick@zeta.org.au (Nick Andrew) wrote: >In <ys4stod03w.fsf_-_@tulyar.sdd.cegelecproj.co.uk> Dunstan_Vavasour <Dunstan_Vavasour@cegelecproj.co.uk> writes: > >>What they do is keep changing the internal formats so that old >>versions quickly become unuseable. > >It occurred to me on discussing this issue that perhaps the save format >(what is written to disk) may be closely related to the data structures >used in the program. > >It may be that when the user "saves" a document that the in-memory data >structures are dumped to disk with little or no formatting, which results >in the oft-reported junk and deleted text in the output file. > >When Micro$oft releases a new version, the data structure fields or their >relationship in memory are probably different, and so different versions >of the program are unable to load each others' native file formats. There >may be compatibility hooks to allow newer versions to read the files of >older versions, but it doesn't work in the other direction. > >This all goes to show that it's important for commercial, proprietary >software to be open in terms of file formats and interfaces. It becomes >more important as the world increasingly relies on these programs - after >a point it's just not acceptable to _allow_ a company to control internals! It's impossible to keep file formats secret. What are you talking about? > >Nick. >-- >Zeta Internet SP4 Fax: +61-2-9233-6545 Voice: 9231-9400 >G.P.O. Box 3400, Sydney NSW 1043 http://www.zeta.org.au/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36211054.23043728@news.concentric.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<907103252snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <OtvFDIAmbgE2Ewio@dlsl.demon.co.uk> <ys4stod03w.fsf_-_@tulyar.sdd.cegelecproj.co.uk> <6v19t4$ksh$1@gidora.zeta.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1103af,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: f4bda,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bda,public X-Google-Thread: 10d8ad,4460b3faefba3773 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d8ad,public X-Google-Thread: fcfb9,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcfb9,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,942a0596db2b8174 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: darrow@oneillaw.com (M O'Neill) Subject: Re: Microsoft and obsolescence (was Re: KDE v. Gnome - don't you guys ever change subject lines when a thread goes off topic?) Date: 1998/10/11 Message-ID: <36211054.23043728@news.concentric.net> X-Deja-AN: 400024137 References: <907103252snz@vision25.demon.co.uk> <OtvFDIAmbgE2Ewio@dlsl.demon.co.uk> <ys4stod03w.fsf_-_@tulyar.sdd.cegelecproj.co.uk> <6v19t4$ksh$1@gidora.zeta.org.au> Organization: Concentric Internet Services Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss