🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:42:52 +0100, Old Codger
<oldcodger@anyoldwhere.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:31:39 +0100, Malcolm Ogilvie the troll and
>bully <Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk>  sought to start conflict and
>trouble when he wrote:
>
>>
>>Three years ago when someone here suggested:
>>
>>"I read about the development of a contraceptive drug for grey 
>>squirrels, I think it was London University, that would reduce grey 
>>squirrel numbers and allow reds to persist without killing."
>>
>>Angus responded with:
>>"I could agree with that."
>>
>>
>>Yet a few days ago, the following letter was published in The Scotsman:
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>Dangerous road
>>With regard to your report "Chemically castrate grey squirrels to save 
>>reds, demands MSP" (27 May), the potential for unintended consequences 
>>and moral decline with immunocontraception as a form of population 
>>control is enormous . Before long, so-called conservationists could 
>>begin favouring designer wildlife populations that suit their agenda and 
>>wiping out those considered unacceptable by their origin or abundance 
>>within a few generations.
>>Indeed, in a world beset with an unsustainable human population, how 
>>long would it be before someone, somewhere, decided it was appropriate 
>>to use the technology to control humans, similar to that advocated by 
>>the German medical experimentation programmes of the 1930s?
>>
>>A world even more controlled than it is at present is a frightening 
>>prospect.
>>
>>ANGUS MacMILLAN
>>Meikle Boturich, near Balloch
>>Dunbartonshire
>>---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>So why is what Angus thought was good enough for grey squirrels three 
>>years ago, and also regarded it as preferable to shooting deer a few 
>>years before that, now much too dangerous to consider using on grey 
>>squirrels?
>
>
>You are hardly one to criticize inconsistency.  You have already been
>sacked from one employee for being a bully, and warned by others. We
>get a few months of peace from you and then like the sneaky little
>snake you are it all starts again. Your post is clearly designed to
>cause trouble and attack your victims once again.
>
>We also remember when you tried to claim your book on grebes was the
>first book on grebes. It later transpired that you had copied Konters
>book and then tried desperately to cover it up with threats and abuse.
>Of course it never worked and the world now knows Dr Malcolm Ogilvie
>of The SNH is a liar, cheat, fraud and bully as we can see here.
>
>http://tinyurl.com/ytkqgn
>
>and
>
>http://tinyurl.com/3npxvm

That would also explain why Ogilvie tries so hard to hide his posts
from the Google archives then by setting x-no archive? Very
suspicious.
--


Have you ever noticed that if something is advertised as 'amusing' or 
'hilarious', it usually isn't? 





















































































Cut Here............................................
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **