🚀 go-pugleaf

Old Codger wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:31:39 +0100, Malcolm Ogilvie the troll and
> bully <Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk>  sought to start conflict and
> trouble when he wrote:
> 
>> Three years ago when someone here suggested:
>>
>> "I read about the development of a contraceptive drug for grey 
>> squirrels, I think it was London University, that would reduce grey 
>> squirrel numbers and allow reds to persist without killing."
>>
>> Angus responded with:
>> "I could agree with that."
>>
>>
>> Yet a few days ago, the following letter was published in The Scotsman:
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dangerous road
>> With regard to your report "Chemically castrate grey squirrels to save 
>> reds, demands MSP" (27 May), the potential for unintended consequences 
>> and moral decline with immunocontraception as a form of population 
>> control is enormous . Before long, so-called conservationists could 
>> begin favouring designer wildlife populations that suit their agenda and 
>> wiping out those considered unacceptable by their origin or abundance 
>> within a few generations.
>> Indeed, in a world beset with an unsustainable human population, how 
>> long would it be before someone, somewhere, decided it was appropriate 
>> to use the technology to control humans, similar to that advocated by 
>> the German medical experimentation programmes of the 1930s?
>>
>> A world even more controlled than it is at present is a frightening 
>> prospect.
>>
>> ANGUS MacMILLAN
>> Meikle Boturich, near Balloch
>> Dunbartonshire
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> So why is what Angus thought was good enough for grey squirrels three 
>> years ago, and also regarded it as preferable to shooting deer a few 
>> years before that, now much too dangerous to consider using on grey 
>> squirrels?
> 
> 
> You are hardly one to criticize inconsistency.  You have already been
> sacked from one employee for being a bully, and warned by others. We
> get a few months of peace from you and then like the sneaky little
> snake you are it all starts again. Your post is clearly designed to
> cause trouble and attack your victims once again.
> 
> We also remember when you tried to claim your book on grebes was the
> first book on grebes. It later transpired that you had copied Konters
> book and then tried desperately to cover it up with threats and abuse.
> Of course it never worked and the world now knows Dr Malcolm Ogilvie
> of The SNH is a liar, cheat, fraud and bully as we can see here.
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/ytkqgn
> 
> and
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/3npxvm


Would you care to comment, Malcy? When you decline to respond to such 
charges, it is hardly surprising that others are 'given to understand' 
certain things.