🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 10 May 2002 00:59:58 +0100, "Wm..."
<tcnw51@tarrcity.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>>You also seem to be under the impression that dropping groups is a
>>"good thing" and to be further assuming that this view is widely held.

>No, I think dropping groups is a bad thing, ...

I assumed that you meant what you said when you wrote:

>Before anyone in d.s yells hypocrite I think the group in question ought 
>to have been pulled yonks ago

and:

>Groups that should be pulled take (relatively) ages to be 
>pulled

and:

>If you send me an e-mail I'll tell you the group I 
>reported that got pulled and I think ought to have been pulled and why.

and:

>In the case of the group concerned I'm happy it was pulled.

Now that you've contracticted yourself [dropping groups is bad,
pulling groups is good], I really don't know what you think :-(  

Unless the words "drop" and "pull" don't mean the same.

>perhaps you missed the last 
>part of my posting on purpose.

No.  Perhaps you could try again?

>But what I am also doing is pointing out the lack of transparency.

I understand that point.  It's the rest of your argument that's beyond
me.

Regards, Mike.

-- 
Solaris at home: http://www.kempston.org/solaris/