Article View: uk.net.regulation
Article #27Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ?
From: Roland Perry
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:36
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:36
24 lines
3008 bytes
3008 bytes
In message <MD2U7.50$ff4.47441@monolith.news.easynet.net>, pisces
<pisces48@yahoo.com> writes
>on the face of it, government must believe it
>broadens the kind of data and length of time for which it can be retained,
It doesn't broaden the kinds of data, at least while the CoP is
voluntary. I have a feeling that people think more kinds of data are
being kept than is actually the case.
>and allows them to insist that data which is not currently retained by a
>particular ISP will be in future -
Let's be careful not to confuse "starting to log things you didn't
before" with "retaining a log that churned off rather rapidly before".
> if not, what is the point of this
>legislation ?
It stems largely from a feeling that "evidence is being destroyed",
because it's not being kept long enough.
--
Roland Perry | tel: +44 1733 207705 | roland@linx.org
Director of Public Policy | fax: +44 1733 207729 | http://www.linx.net
London Internet Exchange | mbl: +44 7050 604080 | /contact/roland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<oCFozgIxANI8EwdY@perry.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!london.linx.net!perry.co.uk!rolandReferences:
<ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <7shl1u04alrar0oioclepforvct06orpe9@4ax.com> <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net> <+5jhP3MRtaH8Ew1O@romana.davros.org> <o4xT7.1414$8%.418515@monolith.news.easynet.net> <TI13kiPlX9H8EAzE@turnpike.com> <MD2U7.50$ff4.47441@monolith.news.easynet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd4f2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd4f2,public X-Google-Thread: fad9d,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public X-Google-Thread: 11543b,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid11543b,public X-Google-Thread: 10b38e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b38e,public X-Google-Thread: 101ff2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101ff2,public X-Google-Thread: f6b0a,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6b0a,public X-Google-Thread: 104271,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid104271,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-19 09:41:13 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!london.linx.net!perry.co.uk!roland From: Roland Perry <roland@linx.net> Newsgroups: uk.net.regulation,alt.privacy,uk.politics.censorship,demon.service,uk.gov.social-security,uk.politics.crime,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.anonymous.email Subject: Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ? Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:36:49 +0000 Organization: LINX Message-ID: <oCFozgIxANI8EwdY@perry.co.uk> References: <ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <7shl1u04alrar0oioclepforvct06orpe9@4ax.com> <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net> <+5jhP3MRtaH8Ew1O@romana.davros.org> <o4xT7.1414$8%.418515@monolith.news.easynet.net> <TI13kiPlX9H8EAzE@turnpike.com> <MD2U7.50$ff4.47441@monolith.news.easynet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: london.linx.net X-NNTP-Posting-Host: london.linx.net:195.66.232.34 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1008783625 nnrp-07:19036 NO-IDENT london.linx.net:195.66.232.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Turnpike/6.01-Beta-1-U (<99bvcd6i0Dn$PgtX8z4nROrcFL>) Lines: 24