Article View: uk.net.regulation
Article #38Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ?
From: Richard Clayton
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:56
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:56
31 lines
3164 bytes
3164 bytes
In article <3C1BA1E2.D4EFAA5D@zhochaka.demon.co.uk>, David G. Bell <dbell@zhochaka.demon.co.uk> writes >Richard Clayton wrote: >> >> In article <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net>, pisces >> <pisces48@yahoo.com> writes >> >> >A police Super (or >> >equivalent spook or Customs), can on his own authority without a warrant, >> >order up traffic data on one person or a million, if HE thinks that is >> >"proportionate". >> >> he will also need to have the budget to pay for this ... so the >> accountants may help to keep his sense of proportion in check > >But the technology keeps getting more powerful for the same money, the cost is for access to the stored data ... which, where there are low volumes of requests, is mainly a manual process hence the cost of suddenly asking for millions of records will be many millions ... and I do appreciate your point that over time you'll get more data for your Euro -- but in the short term this is likely to be a significant brake on the expansion of activities -- richard Richard Clayton They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1VdujsKGiRH8EAXs@turnpike.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!happyday.demon.co.uk!turnpike.com!richardReferences:
<ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <7shl1u04alrar0oioclepforvct06orpe9@4ax.com> <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net> <xQd$iACAt2G8EAPc@turnpike.com> <3C1BA1E2.D4EFAA5D@zhochaka.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd4f2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd4f2,public X-Google-Thread: 11543b,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid11543b,public X-Google-Thread: fad9d,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-Thread: 10b38e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b38e,public X-Google-Thread: 104271,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid104271,public X-Google-Thread: f6b0a,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6b0a,public X-Google-Thread: 101ff2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101ff2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-16 14:01:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!happyday.demon.co.uk!turnpike.com!richard From: Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com> Newsgroups: uk.net.regulation,alt.privacy,uk.politics.censorship,demon.service,uk.gov.social-security,uk.politics.crime,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.anonymous.email Subject: Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ? Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:56:22 +0000 Organization: Highwayman Associates Ltd Message-ID: <1VdujsKGiRH8EAXs@turnpike.com> References: <ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <7shl1u04alrar0oioclepforvct06orpe9@4ax.com> <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net> <xQd$iACAt2G8EAPc@turnpike.com> <3C1BA1E2.D4EFAA5D@zhochaka.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: happyday.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: happyday.demon.co.uk:158.152.30.53 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1008540048 nnrp-01:19297 NO-IDENT happyday.demon.co.uk:158.152.30.53 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 M <7fPN0OjtGdv6AX1irDkRphaT6+> Lines: 31