Article View: uk.net.web.authoring
Article #67Re: Help! My entire website has been *stolen*!
From: Dr John Stockton
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 15:08
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 15:08
55 lines
3796 bytes
3796 bytes
JRS: In article <3A7C875D.C7994C05@johnrnew.demon.co.uk>, seen in news:demon.homepages.authoring, John New <johnnew@johnrnew.demon.co.uk> wrote at Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:34:05 :- >On one commercial course on design I went on a few years ago this was >actively encouraged for beginners wanting to set up a new site. I think >it is morally wrong as an ocasional designer but I don't see how you can >stop it. Two things are needed; to prove copying, and then to get satisfaction. For the first : Just ensure that your work remains recognisable as your own, even if topped and tailed and edited. Obvious signs will be removed; but, often, thieves are persons of lower intellect, not examining what they steal. Hopefully, well-concealed marker will not be noticed. Nothing too obvious should be used, though; or use something nearly obvious for them to find, with something less obvious that they will then not look for. Real text can have subtle grammar or spelling mistakes; my freely- offered contrubitions to a US-written FAQ were for months recognisable by residual English spellings. Numerous methods are available for hiding information, and, if enough are used, some are likely to survive. Every picture can with suitable software, be watermarked invisibly with your identity. When you wish to prove copying, revealing your name with standard software should be fairly convincing. For the second : In many cases, where the thief does not own the hosting system, a well- directed complaint, with proof, will suffice (AIUI); good ISPs do not allow users to breach copyright, and a respectable firm will not tolerate material stolen by its Web designers on its site. - I wonder whether you noticed that your name was concealed in three paragraphs of my text above? And that each of those paragraphs contained another marker of such a nature that if most were found in corresponding places on another site it would be a definite sign of copying? The intentional spelling mistake above, though indisputable, is not found by the spelling-checker I use; I wonder whether the word was introduced into the dictionary as a copying-detector (it's not in CUSTOM.DIC, before you ask!)? -- � John Stockton, Surrey, UK. jrs@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v4.00 MIME. � Web <URL: http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links. Proper 4-line sig. separator is as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036) Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<xOQQfCAWBXf6Ew+j@merlyn.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!grolier!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!merlyn.demon.co.uk!spamReferences:
<EHT+B4Aeiwa6EwAr@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3A7C875D.C7994C05@johnrnew.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f76f2,71da7a1f41260aad X-Google-Attributes: gidf76f2,public X-Google-Thread: f5cde,71da7a1f41260aad X-Google-Attributes: gidf5cde,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-04 08:33:16 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!grolier!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!merlyn.demon.co.uk!spam From: Dr John Stockton <spam@merlyn.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.net.web.authoring,demon.homepages.authoring Subject: Re: Help! My entire website has been *stolen*! Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:08:06 +0000 Organization: Home, 'Surrey', UK Message-ID: <xOQQfCAWBXf6Ew+j@merlyn.demon.co.uk> References: <EHT+B4Aeiwa6EwAr@urban75.demon.co.uk> <3A7C875D.C7994C05@johnrnew.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: Dr John Stockton <jrs@merlyn.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: merlyn.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: merlyn.demon.co.uk:158.152.233.145 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 981304358 nnrp-13:21717 NO-IDENT merlyn.demon.co.uk:158.152.233.145 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.00 <FaPHOaas0ellLCXbR0oIxSiVaE> Lines: 55