🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by TREHARAJ Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:52
Re: City Traffic
#116
Author: TREHARAJ
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:52
34 lines
1520 bytes
==============================================================================
:Bob Hendley writes:
:>===============================================================================
:>
:>In article <1993Jan22.143422.23243@gssec.bt.co.uk> amatthew@gssec.bt.co.uk (Alan Matthews) writes
:>
:>>Try taking into account the cost to an individual (over a year) of:
:>>
:>
:>[some deleted]
:>
:>>
:>>and also the less quantifiable costs which everyone contributes to:
:>>
:>>cost of road repairs caused by every extra car on the road
:>>cost of new roads / road widening needed due to the extra cars on the road
:>>cost of pollution
:>>
:>>On that basis, public transport is cheaper not only for individuals but for
:>>society as a whole.
:>>
:>
:>This would appear to assume that buses (in particular) cause less
:>damage to roads, require less road space and cause less pollution than
:>cars.
:>
:>The first is clearly untrue. <deleted>
:>
:>
Why? One bus will cause more damage than one car, but the arguement is
not for us all to go and buy a bus, it's that we should share the use of
one. One bus vs. several cars? Clearly preferable.

Andy T.
Re: City Traffic
#136
Author: Bob Hendley
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 11:17
47 lines
1913 bytes
In article <935225175215@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk> TREHARAJ@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk writes:
>:>
>:>>
>:>>and also the less quantifiable costs which everyone contributes to:
>:>>
>:>>cost of road repairs caused by every extra car on the road
>:>>cost of new roads / road widening needed due to the extra cars on the road
>:>>cost of pollution
>:>>
>:>>On that basis, public transport is cheaper not only for individuals but for
>:>>society as a whole.
>:>>
>:>
>:>This would appear to assume that buses (in particular) cause less
>:>damage to roads, require less road space and cause less pollution than
>:>cars.
>:>
>:>The first is clearly untrue. <deleted>
>:>
>:>
>Why? One bus will cause more damage than one car, but the arguement is
>not for us all to go and buy a bus, it's that we should share the use of
>one. One bus vs. several cars? Clearly preferable.
>

No.

Road damage increases dramatically with axle weight. This means that
a typical bus, weighing ~10 times the weight of a typical car, will
cause MUCH more than 10 times the damage of 1 car.

If you want anecdotal evidence of this, take a look at the road surface
at a bus stop that has not been reinforced. Alternatively, look at the
surface of a road that has a long standing bus lane. The results are
dramatic!



Bob



-- 
R.J.Hendley@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science			Phone: +44 21 414 4761
University of Birmingham			Home:  +44 21 444 8656
PO Box 363, Birmingham, UK			Fax:   +44 21 414 4281
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads