🚀 go-pugleaf

--Outlaw Frog Raper-- wrote:

> Matthew T. Russotto wrote:
> >
> > In article <35561BC4.4B6C@law.met>, Robert Munoz  <munoz@law.net> wrote:
> > }
> > }And I don't like you. Grow up, pay taxes, and take responsibility for
> > }your actions like the rest of us do.
> >
> > One who is 18 is already required to take responsbility for his
> > actions -- he may be sued in civil court, he is always tried as an
> > adult in criminal court.  If he has a job, he pays taxes.  So what's
> > your excuse for forbidding drinking for those 18-21 again?
>
> Even Iran lets 16 year olds vote.
>
> In Holland you can buy alcohol and pot at 16, driving is 18.
>
> Maybe driving is the problem. Why can't non-drivers drink.

Better yet:  If _YOU_ drink and drive, then _YOU_ have to pay full price, not
everybody born after 11 May 1977.  They can raise the fines, (the sky's the
limit, free money.) and they can increase the licence revocation period
(again, no limit) and mandate a zillion hours of community service (free
labour) but then politicians that get caught would have to pay.  So instead,
they raise the DRINKING AGE and make somebody else pay.  Fuck democracy, buy
for minors.

Tom Alciere
talciere@xtdl.com
AllCopsSuk@aol.com

>
>
> Stupid laws.
>
> > --
> > Matthew T. Russotto                                russotto@pond.com
> > "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
> > of justice is no virtue."