🚀 go-pugleaf

Justin John Downs wrote:
> 
> i completely agree with dude's assessment of kate chopin. just
> to please those of you who feel that a literary critique should
> sound intelligent, well here goes:
> 
> kate chopin's writing style is extremely boring. in fact, most
> writing of this age tends to be this way. the genres of
> trancendentalism, romanticism, et al. are no exception because
> i feel that it is absolutely fruitless to try and model one's
> literary work after some silly, contrived definition. the
> result is, as i've said previously, tear-inducing boredom.
> 
> not to spoil it for those of you who have not read the kate
> chopin short "desiree's baby", the original query does quite
> correctly state that this short contains a surprise twist.
> however, it is hardly enough to erase the boredom of her
> literary style.
> 
> i'm sure that you want quotes, citations, etc. etc. to back up
> my arguments, but since this entire response is utter bulls**t
> (and, in fact, i have never even HEARD of kate chopin) i can
> not provide any. this all backs up my ultimate point: English
> majors suck because if i turned in an expanded version of these
> three or four paragraphs as a term paper, i would probably at
> least get a b+.


Not from me you wouldn't.

mike furlough