🚀 go-pugleaf

"Matthew T. Russotto" <russotto@wanda.vf.pond.com> wrote in message
news:982U4.7628$LM4.555443@monger.newsread.com...
> In article <3920acb1_1@news.provide.net>,
> James Doemer <bigtoe@provide.net> wrote:
> }
> }
> }
> }"Matthew T. Russotto" <russotto@wanda.vf.pond.com> wrote in message
> }news:wH1U4.7620$LM4.554932@monger.newsread.com...
> }>
> }> What difference would it make?  Some people in uniforms are shooting at
> }> someone else.  How can this second person make things any worse by
> }> firing back?  At best, he kills them and is killed by the state later.
At
> }> worst, they kill him right there, which is what they're up to anyway.
> }>
> }
> }I have trouble getting anyone in this forum to answer a direct question
with
> }a direct answer.    The question is: Do you believe that they have a
right
> }to self defense in that circumstance?
>
> Of course they do.

Good, we're making progress then.

> My point is that it doesn't matter whether or not
> they have the right; they can't lose any more by defending themselves.
> To assert that they do not have the right to self defense in such a
> situation is to assert that they have a duty to meekly accept being
> executed by anyone with a badge.
>
> }And, as an added question:  From your response, it appears that you
support
> }a police state, is that true?
>
> No, I don't support the situation, I just recognize it.
> --