🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: va.general
Article #512

Re: red light camera question

#512
From: Paul R
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 01:31
79 lines
4775 bytes
I would hope that the people who set up these cameras would have
the good sense not to set off a flash right in the eyes of a driver.

Cameras are being placed at busy intersections.  Running a red
light at a busy intersection is a pretty lame-brained thing to do.
But running it blind has got to be worse.  You'd hope that the
cameras weren't positioned to blind the lame-brain that's
running the red light.

Paul R

"NightSerf" <acs6j@Virginia.EDU> wrote in message
news:9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU...
> You may be right.  My thinking was that a night camera, in order
> to photograph the car along with the front plate and the
> driver's face, would have to flash at the front of the car.  If
> that's true, then flashes in the rear view mirror would be
> catching someone moving through the intersection from the
> opposite direction.  But if the camera is photographing the
> rear of the car, then a flash in the rear view mirror would be
> doing just as you said.
>
> A year or so ago, someone posted that his daughter had been
> nabbed while cutting classes, which is what made me believe
> that the cameras were positioned so as to photograph the driver
> as well as the license plate.  Not so?
>
> In va.general John R Cambron <*cambronj@chesapeake.net*> wrote:
>
> > NightSerf wrote:
> > >
> > > In va.general Ken M. <poboxdc@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > natejax wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I was just driving it was dark and rainy out, I was one of a few
cars
> > > > > going through on a yellow, in my rearview mirror i saw 2 bright
> > > > > flashes and was thinking i may be at risk for getting a ticket for
the
> > > > > red light camera, i had heard that these tickets do not carry
points
> > > > > in the state of VA, is that correct?  ive searched google and the
web
> > > > > and could not get a straight answer though it seems that this is
the
> > > > > case. please advise.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > > Get ready to pay a fine!
> > >
> > > > (ken)
> > >
> > > Not necesarily.  What Nate saw may have been flashes from a
> > > camera catching some one going through from the opposite
> > > direction.  If he was most of the way through before the light
> > > turned red--he didn't mention seeing the red light--he was
> > > probably not captured.
>
> > If he saw flashes in his "rearview" mirror it is likely either he
> > or some one behind him was caught. I have seen the same flashes
> > after clearing the intersection when I entered intersection after
> > the light turned yellow and other car entered the intersection
> > during yellow and red.
> > --
> > ======================================================================
> > NT Geek, MCP
> > Transit Geek
> > http://www.chesapeake.net/~cambronj/wmata/
> > Model Railroader HO N                                   John R Cambron
> > http://www.chesapeake.net/~cambronj/sunbelt/        North Beach MD USA
> > Railroad Geek                                  cambronj@chesapeake.net
> > ======================================================================
>
> --
> Serf tomb nor stone nor grave for me
> (andy sims) just a bier up in a tree
> acs6j@virginia.edu to let the cold wind take me in
Technical Details
Message-ID: <P%eU6.71318$4f7.5444760@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <df481569.0106011937.745d838@posting.google.com> <3B1861D0.6A5EC313@ix.netcom.com> <9fc7gg$4fq$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ti07mdbibsg9d2@corp.supernews.com> <9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11299e,bf5785b4a0554983
X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public
X-Google-Thread: fb785,3713032fc760589c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,bf5785b4a0554983
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-08 18:31:28 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul R" <prouda@asqnet.gro>
Newsgroups: va.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving
References: <df481569.0106011937.745d838@posting.google.com> <3B1861D0.6A5EC313@ix.netcom.com> <9fc7gg$4fq$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ti07mdbibsg9d2@corp.supernews.com> <9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Subject: Re: red light camera question
Lines: 81
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <P%eU6.71318$4f7.5444760@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 01:31:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.87.95.151
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 992050287 12.87.95.151 (Sat, 09 Jun 2001 01:31:27 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 01:31:27 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet