Article View: va.general
Article #513Re: red light camera question
From: NightSerf
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 03:11
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 03:11
110 lines
6180 bytes
6180 bytes
It wouldn't be necessary to "blind" the driver to get a pic of the face. For one thing, the flash would have to be positioned in a different spot than the camera or the camera would only capture the return of the flash from the windshield. The flash would be located well away from any spot that the driver would be likely to focus on at the time. Also, the frequency of the light the flash emits could be chosen to minimize the after-image. That being said, the response just before yours does confirm that it is the rear of the car that is photographed, leaving it up the the owner of the car to either identify the driver or accept the ticket. This brings up a problem with the camera: moving citations have always been issued to the offending driver, not the car's owner. The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and while the camera provides evidence that a light was run by a specific car, it does not identify the driver. What happens if someone is driving the car without the knowledge or permission of the owner? Does the burder shift or does the Commonwealth still have to prove that the owner was at the wheel? In va.general Paul R <prouda@asqnet.gro> wrote: > I would hope that the people who set up these cameras would have > the good sense not to set off a flash right in the eyes of a driver. > Cameras are being placed at busy intersections. Running a red > light at a busy intersection is a pretty lame-brained thing to do. > But running it blind has got to be worse. You'd hope that the > cameras weren't positioned to blind the lame-brain that's > running the red light. > Paul R > "NightSerf" <acs6j@Virginia.EDU> wrote in message > news:9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU... > > You may be right. My thinking was that a night camera, in order > > to photograph the car along with the front plate and the > > driver's face, would have to flash at the front of the car. If > > that's true, then flashes in the rear view mirror would be > > catching someone moving through the intersection from the > > opposite direction. But if the camera is photographing the > > rear of the car, then a flash in the rear view mirror would be > > doing just as you said. > > > > A year or so ago, someone posted that his daughter had been > > nabbed while cutting classes, which is what made me believe > > that the cameras were positioned so as to photograph the driver > > as well as the license plate. Not so? > > > > In va.general John R Cambron <*cambronj@chesapeake.net*> wrote: > > > > > NightSerf wrote: > > > > > > > > In va.general Ken M. <poboxdc@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > natejax wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was just driving it was dark and rainy out, I was one of a few > cars > > > > > > going through on a yellow, in my rearview mirror i saw 2 bright > > > > > > flashes and was thinking i may be at risk for getting a ticket for > the > > > > > > red light camera, i had heard that these tickets do not carry > points > > > > > > in the state of VA, is that correct? ive searched google and the > web > > > > > > and could not get a straight answer though it seems that this is > the > > > > > > case. please advise. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > Get ready to pay a fine! > > > > > > > > > (ken) > > > > > > > > Not necesarily. What Nate saw may have been flashes from a > > > > camera catching some one going through from the opposite > > > > direction. If he was most of the way through before the light > > > > turned red--he didn't mention seeing the red light--he was > > > > probably not captured. > > > > > If he saw flashes in his "rearview" mirror it is likely either he > > > or some one behind him was caught. I have seen the same flashes > > > after clearing the intersection when I entered intersection after > > > the light turned yellow and other car entered the intersection > > > during yellow and red. > > > -- > > > ====================================================================== > > > NT Geek, MCP > > > Transit Geek > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~cambronj/wmata/ > > > Model Railroader HO N John R Cambron > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~cambronj/sunbelt/ North Beach MD USA > > > Railroad Geek cambronj@chesapeake.net > > > ====================================================================== > > > > -- > > Serf tomb nor stone nor grave for me > > (andy sims) just a bier up in a tree > > acs6j@virginia.edu to let the cold wind take me in -- Serf tomb nor stone nor grave for me (andy sims) just a bier up in a tree acs6j@virginia.edu to let the cold wind take me in
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9fs444$ao8$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!news2.cstone.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU!not-for-mailReferences:
<df481569.0106011937.745d838@posting.google.com> <3B1861D0.6A5EC313@ix.netcom.com> <9fc7gg$4fq$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ti07mdbibsg9d2@corp.supernews.com> <9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <P%eU6.71318$4f7.5444760@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,bf5785b4a0554983 X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: 11299e,bf5785b4a0554983 X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public X-Google-Thread: fb785,3713032fc760589c X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-08 20:30:15 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!news2.cstone.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU!not-for-mail From: NightSerf <acs6j@Virginia.EDU> Newsgroups: va.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving Subject: Re: red light camera question Date: 9 Jun 2001 03:11:00 GMT Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 110 Message-ID: <9fs444$ao8$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> References: <df481569.0106011937.745d838@posting.google.com> <3B1861D0.6A5EC313@ix.netcom.com> <9fc7gg$4fq$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ti07mdbibsg9d2@corp.supernews.com> <9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <P%eU6.71318$4f7.5444760@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: node3.unix.virginia.edu X-Trace: murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU 992056260 11016 128.143.2.33 (9 Jun 2001 03:11:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@virginia.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jun 2001 03:11:00 GMT X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA 970731; AIX 4.3]