🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: va.general
Article #514

Re: red light camera question

#514
From: Frederick E. Jorden
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 14:39
122 lines
6696 bytes

NightSerf wrote:

> It wouldn't be necessary to "blind" the driver to get a pic of
> the face.  For one thing, the flash would have to be positioned
> in a different spot than the camera or the camera would only
> capture the return of the flash from the windshield.  The flash
> would be located well away from any spot that the driver would
> be likely to focus on at the time.  Also, the frequency of the
> light the flash emits could be chosen to minimize the
> after-image.
>
> That being said, the response just before yours does confirm
> that it is the rear of the car that is photographed, leaving it
> up the the owner of the car to either identify the driver or
> accept the ticket.
>
> This brings up a problem with the camera:  moving citations
> have always been issued to the offending driver, not the car's
> owner.  The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and
> while the camera provides evidence that a light was run by a
> specific car, it does not identify the driver.  What happens if
> someone is driving the car without the knowledge or permission
> of the owner?  Does the burder shift or does the Commonwealth
> still have to prove that the owner was at the wheel?
>
> In va.general Paul R <prouda@asqnet.gro> wrote:
> > I would hope that the people who set up these cameras would have
> > the good sense not to set off a flash right in the eyes of a driver.
>
> > Cameras are being placed at busy intersections.  Running a red
> > light at a busy intersection is a pretty lame-brained thing to do.
> > But running it blind has got to be worse.  You'd hope that the
> > cameras weren't positioned to blind the lame-brain that's
> > running the red light.
>

What about night vision technology?

>
> > Paul R
>
> > "NightSerf" <acs6j@Virginia.EDU> wrote in message
> > news:9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU...
> > > You may be right.  My thinking was that a night camera, in order
> > > to photograph the car along with the front plate and the
> > > driver's face, would have to flash at the front of the car.  If
> > > that's true, then flashes in the rear view mirror would be
> > > catching someone moving through the intersection from the
> > > opposite direction.  But if the camera is photographing the
> > > rear of the car, then a flash in the rear view mirror would be
> > > doing just as you said.
> > >
> > > A year or so ago, someone posted that his daughter had been
> > > nabbed while cutting classes, which is what made me believe
> > > that the cameras were positioned so as to photograph the driver
> > > as well as the license plate.  Not so?
> > >
> > > In va.general John R Cambron <*cambronj@chesapeake.net*> wrote:
> > >
> > > > NightSerf wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In va.general Ken M. <poboxdc@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > > > natejax wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > I was just driving it was dark and rainy out, I was one of a few
> > cars
> > > > > > > going through on a yellow, in my rearview mirror i saw 2 bright
> > > > > > > flashes and was thinking i may be at risk for getting a ticket for
> > the
> > > > > > > red light camera, i had heard that these tickets do not carry
> > points
> > > > > > > in the state of VA, is that correct?  ive searched google and the
> > web
> > > > > > > and could not get a straight answer though it seems that this is
> > the
> > > > > > > case. please advise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Get ready to pay a fine!
> > > > >
> > > > > > (ken)
> > > > >
> > > > > Not necesarily.  What Nate saw may have been flashes from a
> > > > > camera catching some one going through from the opposite
> > > > > direction.  If he was most of the way through before the light
> > > > > turned red--he didn't mention seeing the red light--he was
> > > > > probably not captured.
> > >
> > > > If he saw flashes in his "rearview" mirror it is likely either he
> > > > or some one behind him was caught. I have seen the same flashes
> > > > after clearing the intersection when I entered intersection after
> > > > the light turned yellow and other car entered the intersection
> > > > during yellow and red.
> > > > --
> > > > ======================================================================
> > > > NT Geek, MCP
> > > > Transit Geek
> > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~cambronj/wmata/
> > > > Model Railroader HO N                                   John R Cambron
> > > > http://www.chesapeake.net/~cambronj/sunbelt/        North Beach MD USA
> > > > Railroad Geek                                  cambronj@chesapeake.net
> > > > ======================================================================
> > >
> > > --
> > > Serf tomb nor stone nor grave for me
> > > (andy sims) just a bier up in a tree
> > > acs6j@virginia.edu to let the cold wind take me in
>
> --
> Serf                    tomb nor stone nor grave for me
> (andy sims)             just a bier up in a tree
> acs6j@virginia.edu      to let the cold wind take me in

--
Frederick E. Jorden http://fejcpapc.com/
Frederick E. Jorden, CPA PC
10049 Midlothian Tpk - 2-H Richmond, VA 23235 EMAIL fejcpa@erols.com
(804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3B223505.73DE082E@erols.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail
References: <df481569.0106011937.745d838@posting.google.com> <3B1861D0.6A5EC313@ix.netcom.com> <9fc7gg$4fq$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ti07mdbibsg9d2@corp.supernews.com> <9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <P%eU6.71318$4f7.5444760@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <9fs444$ao8$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11299e,bf5785b4a0554983
X-Google-Attributes: gid11299e,public
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,bf5785b4a0554983
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-Thread: fb785,3713032fc760589c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-09 07:47:02 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail
From: "Frederick E. Jorden" <fejcpa@erols.com>
Newsgroups: va.general,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,dc.driving
Subject: Re: red light camera question
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 10:39:01 -0400
Lines: 124
Message-ID: <3B223505.73DE082E@erols.com>
References: <df481569.0106011937.745d838@posting.google.com> <3B1861D0.6A5EC313@ix.netcom.com> <9fc7gg$4fq$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ti07mdbibsg9d2@corp.supernews.com> <9fpd7u$b8j$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <P%eU6.71318$4f7.5444760@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <9fs444$ao8$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVYuCHG9DZQawo+KzNy6DMSZcCeZbEvsvll+Gb1IKjJUZ3mqtoWGmnJj
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jun 2001 14:46:15 GMT
X-Mailer:  Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language:  en