Article View: wa.general
Article #319Re: Greens WA and ALP WA building 5 new coal powered stations and blocking uranium, makes no sense
From: jg
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21
62 lines
3765 bytes
3765 bytes
Brad wrote: > "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message > news:6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net... >> >> >> "Stephen X. Carter" <steve@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message >> news:48bdf334.596396@localhost... >>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:51:37 +1000, "Trevor Wilson" >>> <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> "Brad" <brad@someplace.com> wrote in message >>>> news:t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au... >>>>> Are both these parties for or ahainst global warming? >>>>> I get the destict feeling that both parties are skeptical on global >>>>> warming. >>>>> >>>>> The Greens have a preference deal with the ALP WA which has to mean >>>>> they >>>>> are for coal power. Just the other day they wanted solar only. >>>> **Bullshit. Read their policy statement. You've been told this before, so >>>> I >>>> can only assume that you are a complete moron. >>> As a public service, from <http://www.wa.greens.org.au/policy/energy> >>> here it is. (It may be >>> good, it may be mad, etc - I make no comment other than to suggest to the >>> Lib running dogs here >>> that they at least read it and comment on any facts from within that they >>> are not happy about. >>> :-) >> **The babbling idiot, known as 'Brad' seems incapable of reading the >> facts. It seems to concentrate on it's own delusion. > > POT KETTLE BLACK. > > We miners will hav eads in the West Australian Newspaper starting this > Friday > going into Saturday news paper to put the GREENS LAST no matter who the > public > bvote for. About time the GREENS disappear as they have no idea about > anything at all. > > Why would the Greens back coal power stations by giving the ALP its > prefferences. That'd be those miners who don't mine coal in Collie. > The Libs are wanting to go GAS power which uses 50% less carbon than coal. > Don't we all? Have the libs thought of a way whereby we can afford to reserve our future in gas where the ALP has not been able to? > Why would anyone block uranium to China and India for nuclear power > stations. > The Greens must be in denial at what is the cause of greenhouse gas. > > > Wot, uranium to Russia embarrassingly dropped from the list already?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0bwvk.33700$IK1.4076@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <6i68tgFp4h9cU1@mid.individual.net> <48bdf334.596396@localhost> <6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net> <k2svk.33604$IK1.22886@news-server.bigpond.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,485462c066fce2e9 X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,485462c066fce2e9 X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,485462c066fce2e9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,gid1083c4,gid10df0c,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: jg <jg@nospam.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: wa.general,aus.general,aus.politics Subject: Re: Greens WA and ALP WA building 5 new coal powered stations and blocking uranium, makes no sense References: <t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <6i68tgFp4h9cU1@mid.individual.net> <48bdf334.596396@localhost> <6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net> <k2svk.33604$IK1.22886@news-server.bigpond.net.au> In-Reply-To: <k2svk.33604$IK1.22886@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 63 Message-ID: <0bwvk.33700$IK1.4076@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21:00 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 121.221.44.23 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1220448060 121.221.44.23 (Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:21:00 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:21:00 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services