🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: wa.general
Article #319

Re: Greens WA and ALP WA building 5 new coal powered stations and blocking uranium, makes no sense

#319
From: jg
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21
62 lines
3765 bytes
Brad wrote:
> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote in message 
> news:6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> "Stephen X. Carter" <steve@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message 
>> news:48bdf334.596396@localhost...
>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:51:37 +1000, "Trevor Wilson" 
>>> <trevor@_SPAMBLOCK_rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Brad" <brad@someplace.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>>> Are both these parties for or ahainst global warming?
>>>>> I get the destict feeling that both parties are skeptical on global
>>>>> warming.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Greens have a preference deal with the ALP WA which has to mean 
>>>>> they
>>>>> are for coal power. Just the other day they wanted solar only.
>>>> **Bullshit. Read their policy statement. You've been told this before, so 
>>>> I
>>>> can only assume that you are a complete moron.
>>> As a public service, from <http://www.wa.greens.org.au/policy/energy> 
>>> here it is.  (It may be
>>> good, it may be mad, etc - I make no comment other than to suggest to the 
>>> Lib running dogs here
>>> that they at least read it and comment on any facts from within that they 
>>> are not happy about.
>>> :-)
>> **The babbling idiot, known as 'Brad' seems incapable of reading the 
>> facts. It seems to concentrate on it's own delusion.
> 
> POT KETTLE BLACK.
> 
> We miners will hav eads in the West Australian Newspaper starting this 
> Friday
> going into Saturday news paper to put the GREENS LAST no matter who the 
> public
> bvote for. About time the GREENS disappear as they have no idea about 
> anything at all.
> 
> Why would the Greens back coal power stations by giving the ALP its 
> prefferences.


That'd be those miners who don't mine coal in Collie.


> The Libs are wanting to go GAS power which uses 50% less carbon than coal.
> 

Don't we all? Have the libs thought of a way whereby we can afford to 
reserve our future in gas where the ALP has not been able to?


> Why would anyone block uranium to China and India for nuclear power 
> stations.
> The Greens must be in denial at what is the cause of greenhouse gas.
> 
> 
> 
Wot, uranium to Russia embarrassingly dropped from the list already?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <0bwvk.33700$IK1.4076@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <6i68tgFp4h9cU1@mid.individual.net> <48bdf334.596396@localhost> <6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net> <k2svk.33604$IK1.22886@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,485462c066fce2e9
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,485462c066fce2e9
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,485462c066fce2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,gid1083c4,gid10df0c,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!news.exile.org!abnormal.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: jg <jg@nospam.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: wa.general,aus.general,aus.politics
Subject: Re: Greens WA and ALP WA building 5 new coal powered stations and
 blocking uranium, makes no sense
References: <t87vk.33112$IK1.23177@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <6i68tgFp4h9cU1@mid.individual.net> <48bdf334.596396@localhost> <6i6b2nFp3lghU1@mid.individual.net> <k2svk.33604$IK1.22886@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <k2svk.33604$IK1.22886@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <0bwvk.33700$IK1.4076@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:21:00 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 121.221.44.23
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1220448060 121.221.44.23 (Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:21:00 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:21:00 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services