🚀 go-pugleaf

tony@altavista.com wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:58:17 GMT, jg <jg@nospam.com> wrote:
> 
>> tony@altavista.com wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:15:24 +0800, "Sandgroper"
>>> <woodbudgie@KNICKERSgmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Brad" <brad@someplace.com> wrote in message 
>>>> news:HOKuk.32868$IK1.9097@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>>> Mr Carpenter has an ad campaign claiming that Radio active Uranium Ore 
>>>>> will be going past schools to the freo port.
>>>>> What a load of rot. Any ore out of the Kimberly which is where the Uranium 
>>>>> is goes to a Kimberley Port where there
>>>>> are rail lines. Uranium Ore is not radio active. If it was there would be 
>>>>> thousands of dead workers which handle the
>>>>> ore by hand every day of the week.
>>>> Bullshit , uranium ore does have low levels of radiation in it's natural 
>>>> state (U235 & U238 ) and it is refined into yellow cake that has a higher 
>>>> concentration of radioactive elements.
>>>> Also Yellow Cake if fairly toxic to people , it is a heavy metal , just like 
>>>> mercury and lead.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you get your facts straight , I bet you don't even live in WA , 
>>>> and have no idea where are the iron ore ports are located , not to mention 
>>>> the fact that the rail lines from the iron ore depostis to the ports are 
>>>> PRIVATELY OWNED , so you will have quite a problem trying to get access to 
>>>> those rail lines as was the case recently .
>>>>
>>>>> Nuclear Waste is a by product from nuclear reactors.
>>>>> I cannot believe the media in WA not looking at these false ads at all.
>>>>> People are believing it in the masses.
>>>> Then the media should also be looking at the false and deceptive adverts 
>>>> that Barnett  is using.
>>>>
>>>>> WA has to be the worst educated state in Australia. People are believing 
>>>>> that
>>>>> uranium ore is radio active because the premier is saying that.
>>>> Physics is not one of your strong points is it ? , perhaps you missed those 
>>>> classes and opted to go and get pissed out of your tiny brain at all those 
>>>> Young Liberal parties , I have heard all about them from other sources than 
>>>> the media.
>>> Physics ?? I would have thought that this would come under
>>> Chemistry....
>> .......
>>
>> There's one confirmation for the ignorant tag.
>> Go to the library and see if you can find the nuclear chemistry section.
>>
> 
> Who am I too argue about that statement....
> 
> What do you suppose these links are all about if not Nuclear Physics
> AND Nuclear Chemistry....
> 
> http://www.google.com.au/search?q=nuclear+physics+%2Bchemistry&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
> 
> They are all probably a bit more knowledgeable than you and I...


Nuclear chemistry might concern itself with chemical toxicity of 
yellowcake, but then again probably not if it emits negligible 
radioactivity.