Article View: wa.general
Article #762Re: Draft Child Care - tough on part time/shift workers
From: Annette
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 00:00
62 lines
2791 bytes
2791 bytes
David brindley wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Oct 1997 15:49:29 +0800, Annette <ntsoft@iinet.net.au> > wrote: > > <<snip>> > >Question: If families who cannot define a pattern of usage or predict > >their care needs for group payments will be paid reprospectively on > >production of receipts..... wont that put them at a disadvantage? > Tough tits. > > Let them pay for their own childcare, not bludge on the community for > what is essentially a private expense. > > The point is.. If I cannot afford the child care I have a couple of choices 1. keep the child at home while I sleep (not good) 2. stop working for the extra day (get social security - (I'd rather work)) > >What all this means to me, is an increase of in excess of $60 per week, > >without any additional income to show for it, and the hassle of getting > >my rebate paid retrospectively should I work 1 or more hours extra. > >I also have the hassle of trying to explain my hours of work to every > >person I speak to. > Tough tits. > > Pay for your own childcare. Get your thieving hands out of my pockets. > > Why should you expect me to pay for your brats? Hey! I work. I pay taxes too ya know :) ok.. look at it this way.... If I had to pay full price of the child care - it would cost more that I earn in 3 nights. So whats the deal here? Is childcare too expensive? Are wages not enough? What?? I asked for practical solutions and you give me this?? Perhaps you are right - we are not supposed to work. You WANT me to stay home and suck up more of YOUR tax dollars? > >oh, and I also heard that before & after hours school care rebates are > >about to drop? Anyone know about this? > > > If they do.... GREAT. > yeah!! all those Mums who will give up work - wonder how that will look in the govts books? all those newly vacated jobs to fill. > >All changes to income, holidays, etc etc will now have to be reported to > >the Agency by the parent, and not the Family Day Care Scheme or Long Day > >Care Center - expect sales of panadol will increase :) > > > Oh, how hard for you poor little things. attitude.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3441DCCF.4EEE@iinet.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<343C8C88.7982@iinet.net.au> <3441743d.3263368@news.bigpond.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,ee488b46561cfe04 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,ee488b46561cfe04 X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,ee488b46561cfe04 X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,public From: Annette <ntsoft@iinet.net.au> Subject: Re: Draft Child Care - tough on part time/shift workers Date: 1997/10/13 Message-ID: <3441DCCF.4EEE@iinet.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 280362157 References: <343C8C88.7982@iinet.net.au> <3441743d.3263368@news.bigpond.com> Organization: iiNet Technologies Newsgroups: wa.general,aus.general,aus.politics