🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: wa.general
Article #762

Re: Draft Child Care - tough on part time/shift workers

#762
From: Annette
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 00:00
62 lines
2791 bytes
David brindley wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 09 Oct 1997 15:49:29 +0800, Annette <ntsoft@iinet.net.au>
> wrote:
>
> <<snip>>
> >Question:  If families who cannot define a pattern of usage or predict
> >their care needs for group payments will be paid reprospectively on
> >production of receipts..... wont that put them at a disadvantage?

> Tough tits.
> 
> Let them pay for their own childcare, not bludge on the community for
> what is essentially a private expense.
> 
>
The point is.. If I cannot afford the child care I have a couple of
choices 
1. keep the child at home while I sleep (not good)
2. stop working for the extra day (get social security - (I'd rather
work))

> >What all this means to me, is an increase of in excess of $60 per week,
> >without any additional income to show for it, and the hassle of getting
> >my rebate paid retrospectively should I work 1 or more hours extra.
> >I also have the hassle of trying to explain my hours of work to every
> >person I speak to.

> Tough tits.
> 
> Pay for your own childcare. Get your thieving hands out of my pockets.
> 
> Why should you expect me to pay for your brats?

Hey! I work.  I pay taxes too ya know :)

ok.. look at it this way.... If I had to pay full price of the child
care - it would cost more that I earn in 3 nights.
So whats the deal here? Is childcare too expensive? Are wages not
enough? What??
I asked for practical solutions and you give me this??

Perhaps you are right - we are not supposed to work. You WANT me to stay
home and suck up more of YOUR tax dollars? 

> >oh, and I also heard that before & after hours school care rebates are
> >about to drop?  Anyone know about this?
> >
> If they do.... GREAT.
> 

yeah!!  all those Mums who will give up work - wonder how that will look
in the govts books? all those newly vacated jobs to fill.

> >All changes to income, holidays, etc etc will now have to be reported to
> >the Agency by the parent, and not the Family Day Care Scheme or Long Day
> >Care Center - expect sales of panadol will increase :)
> >
> Oh, how hard for you poor little things.

attitude.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3441DCCF.4EEE@iinet.net.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <343C8C88.7982@iinet.net.au> <3441743d.3263368@news.bigpond.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,ee488b46561cfe04
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,ee488b46561cfe04
X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public
X-Google-Thread: 1056b9,ee488b46561cfe04
X-Google-Attributes: gid1056b9,public
From: Annette <ntsoft@iinet.net.au>
Subject: Re: Draft Child Care - tough on part time/shift workers
Date: 1997/10/13
Message-ID: <3441DCCF.4EEE@iinet.net.au>
X-Deja-AN: 280362157
References: <343C8C88.7982@iinet.net.au> <3441743d.3263368@news.bigpond.com>
Organization: iiNet Technologies
Newsgroups: wa.general,aus.general,aus.politics