🚀 go-pugleaf

<YEE HA!> wrote in message 
news:4183710e$0$78439$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...
>
>>And according to idiots like you, WHAT EXACTLY should Bush have been doing
>>while his staff was getting more data for him ?
>>Run around like Chicken Little and scream "The sky is falling.  The sky is
>>falling. ...."   ?
>
> By law he is the commander in chief. He is supposed to command. There
> are trillions of things the commander in chief is supposed to do during
> an attack. There is one thing not on the list: do nothing.  That is
> exaclty what the lip biting imbecile did while 3000 people were being
> incinerated.
>

Couple of points for the morons of the world

1)    "Doing nothing" is doing something...
            Just like zero is a number and has a value
        Doing nothing can be useful
        To make it simple for you, think in terms of bread beaking, you sit 
around and wait for the bread to rise or to bake. There is nothing to do but 
sit and wait "doing nothing"...
        In the same way, whyile his people are gathering the data, the 
commander-in-chief is most probably "doing nothing" in that context for the 
simple reason that he has no data to go on to "do something".

2)    The people in the front lines are the one who are supposed to "do 
something" during the actual attack.
       That is the job of FRONT-LINE people like the police, fire-fighters, 
EMTs, soldiers, etc.
        They are responsible for doing something at the scene.
        A commander-in-chief is NOT supposed to be micro-managing them by 
looking over their shoulder and telling them what to do.
        That is the job of their immediate supevisors

3)    A commander-in-chief is a big picture role. In other words a strategy 
and NOT a tactical role.

4)    Considering that:
        a)    Bush was quite a distance away from New York, Washington and 
the Pennsylvania countryside, there was little that Bush could do to get 
there in time to do anything while the "3000 people were being incinerated" 
as you put it.
        b)    Even if he was on the scene, his role is not to rush to the 
frontline and pull people out of the wreckage (again strategy vs tactical)
        c)    There are more highly trained people on the scene to worry 
about the immediate issue and possibilities of preventin, IF POSSIBLE, 
having "3000 people were being incinerated".
        Your expecations and what Bush should have done only demonstrate 
that you are an ignorant idiot who is clueless about reality.


> Osama Bin Laden said this about it:
>
> "We had agreed with the general emir, Mohamed Atta, that he would
> carry out all the attacks within 20 minutes, before Bush and his
> administration would be able to react," said bin Laden, referring to
> the hijackers' leader. "It never occurred to us that the
> commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would leave 50,000 of
> his citizens in the two towers to face those horrors alone."
>
> He continued, "It appeared to him [Bush] that a little girl talking
> about her goat and its butting was more important than the airplanes
> and their butting of the skyscrapers. That gave us three times the
> required period to carry out the operations, thank God."
>

Wow !
    I am impressed
You are truly a moron.
    And you are definitely not worth any more of my time

<plonk>