🚀 go-pugleaf

Truth Dude wrote:

> Check this reply, BONEHEAD....
>
> >> November 10, 2003
> >>
> >> To: Telus.Com <abuse@telus.com>
> >> Re: Usenet Abuse by Telus Customer
>
> >>In reference to the message I received in regards to these allegations,
> >>let me remind you of >>the following...
>
> >>The person who filed this charge uses an anonymous remailer in all his
> >>correspondence; >>therefore, I suggest that this charge cannot be
> >>considered serious as a *real* person with a >>*real* identity cannot be
> >>contacted in regards to their charge.
>
> >>The newsgroups in question are, for the most part, cesspools of vicious
> >>content anyway; >>therefore, making such a charge cannot be taken
> >>seriously anyway.
>
> >>Don't you have better things to do than watch ngs?
>
> The remainder of my reply emphasised that the marketplace for ISPs is quite
> competitive and, in comparison to the often failing service that Telus
> provides these days, far more effective service-wise. I advised Mr.
> Crawford to govern himself accordingly and that he should "think twice"
> before he takes a bite out of his employer's revenue.
>
> Just as a side issue, I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of
> ocassions and found him to be not only very agreeable, but also ready to
> see a Telus subscriber's point of view over a complaint from someone who is
> not. Needless to say, money talks and bullshit walks: I have the money and
> KATO is full of the bullshit.

You're a fucking liar. You overplayed your hand. If Crawford sent a complaint
to Telus on Monday November 10th, you want us to believe that you heard from
them already?

It takes longer than that asshole. In your mental holodeck, you resolved the
whole issue before Crawford even received an automated reply. Not bloody
likely.

"I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of occasions"

BULLSHIT.  You never heard of Crawford before 10 November.

You fail the test. Your status as an unmitigated liar is confirmed.

Adios chump.