🚀 go-pugleaf

<22969b572798c901d2ddb50f216f6ae7@news.teranews.com>Lie Detector  wrote:
> 
> 
> Truth Dude wrote:
> 
>> Check this reply, BONEHEAD....
>>
>> >> November 10, 2003
>> >>
>> >> To: Telus.Com <abuse@telus.com>
>> >> Re: Usenet Abuse by Telus Customer
>>
>> >>In reference to the message I received in regards to these allegations,
>> >>let me remind you of >>the following...
>>
>> >>The person who filed this charge uses an anonymous remailer in all his
>> >>correspondence; >>therefore, I suggest that this charge cannot be
>> >>considered serious as a *real* person with a >>*real* identity cannot 
>> >>be contacted in regards to their charge.
>>
>> >>The newsgroups in question are, for the most part, cesspools of 
>> >>vicious content anyway; >>therefore, making such a charge cannot be 
>> >>taken seriously anyway.
>>
>> >>Don't you have better things to do than watch ngs?
>>
>> The remainder of my reply emphasised that the marketplace for ISPs is 
>> quite competitive and, in comparison to the often failing service that 
>> Telus provides these days, far more effective service-wise. I advised Mr.
>> Crawford to govern himself accordingly and that he should "think twice"
>> before he takes a bite out of his employer's revenue.
>>
>> Just as a side issue, I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of
>> ocassions and found him to be not only very agreeable, but also ready to
>> see a Telus subscriber's point of view over a complaint from someone who 
>> is not. Needless to say, money talks and bullshit walks: I have the 
>> money and KATO is full of the bullshit.
> 
> You're a fucking liar. You overplayed your hand. If Crawford sent a 
> complaint to Telus on Monday November 10th, you want us to believe that 
> you heard from them already?

It maybe that he was working late, answer all those complaints from people 
who didn't like it when someone hurt their feelings on an ng.

Poor dears.

>
> It takes longer than that asshole. In your mental holodeck, you resolved 
> the whole issue before Crawford even received an automated reply. Not 
> bloody likely.
>
> "I have dealt with Mr. Crawford on a number of occasions"
> 
> BULLSHIT.  You never heard of Crawford before 10 November.

And I doubt that you heard of me prior to that date as well. Does this make 
full of even more shit?


> 
> You fail the test. Your status as an unmitigated liar is confirmed.
> 
> Adios chump.

Do I win a prize? Maybe free meal coupons at Taco Bell?

> 
>