🚀 go-pugleaf

"gutz" <dondoherty@canada.com> wrote in message
news:kces1voa97iuev9johfk2sj32gdnv6f95s@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 02:41:17 GMT, "Calgary Rob"
> <calgaryrobnospam@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> >"Sensei Brent" <senseibrentxxx@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> >news:3E1DD5B6.68285F00@shaw.ca...
> >> DNA information is potentially far too dangerous to just let out of the
> >bag at
> >> this time.  People will absolutely misuse the information whether for
> >> nefarious purposes, commercial purposes or because they believe they
are
> >doing
> >> good (but are wrong).
> >
> >Now you start this thread claiming my argument is weak, yet you end it
> >stating exactly what I was stating.  I am not afraid of DNA databases,
and
> >would like to see research done on the subject.  As it stands, I have
seen
> >nothing to say they are bad, except for some week accusations against the
> >government, and myself.
>
> Rob.......if it cost a billion just to register guns, that have minor
> resistance from gun owners; Just how much do you think it would cost
> to get a database of individuals, with probably 90% resistance to
> supplying DNA?
>
> We just can't afford it.

The thing that pisses me off here is simple to explain.
Make it law that you MUST provide a blood sample for the DNA database, and
the first time you are seeing your doctor, or in the hospital they have you.
It doesn't matter a bit if you don't agree, or refuse, or protest. It's the
law.

In Nova Scotia every government office can refuse you service if you owe the
province money. Case in point, the department of motor vehicles. If you have
an outstanding fine, for any reason, the DMV can refuse to register a
vehicle, re-register a vehicle, or renew your drivers license.

So, in that vein if you want medical services, you MUST comply. You provide
a sample, or walk out with a broken leg, or rib, or whatever.
Best of luck to you.

Frank E. Spencer