🚀 go-pugleaf

Hey, Clueless Wonder, I've never denied downloading and WATCHING the
movie. I did. ME. YES, I DID IT. AND I'LL DO IT AGAIN!

I DOWNLOADED AND WATCHED "ONE HOUR PHOTO". And I ate my own popcorn and
curled up in my own comfy chair. And I enjoyed it immensely.

Of course the fact it pisses you off simply adds to the pleasure the
movie brought me. Now I have to go and watch the screener of "Reign of
Fire". Hope that pisses you off some more, you pathetic loser.
--
Peter D

�-�� tayl�rchuk ��|I wrote in message ...
>There you go Doherty...he admits that he not just downloaded the
Hollywood
>movie, One hour photo before it was released to the public...but he
also
>WATCHED it.
>
>He did not pay the copyright holders for the privelage.
>
>He was also aware of the copyright notices shown on any video tape that
one
>would legally rent from a video store.
>
>So he continues to insist that there is no illegal act going on.
>
>He tries to talk about distribution.
>
>He took property owned by the producer of the movie...did not pay the
>producers..and watched it.
>
>Pete Dolman..should not only feel ashamed of himself ... but he should
at
>least admit to us all what his actions really are.
>
>
>
>
>"Peter D" <ple@se.ask> wrote in message
>news:ijSj9.386109$v53.18123215@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
>> NEWS wrote in message <3d8fcfa8$1@news.eol.ca>...
>> <big snip>
>> >Now I may have missed something posted earlier or since.  I see this
>> was
>> >cross posted by Peter D to Can. Legal, thus assuming he was looking
for
>> some
>> >form of confirmation of his position.  It would appear that he has
not
>> >received that confirmation.  What he intends to do with it is his
>> decision.
>> >My opinions are just that, take them or leave them. :-)
>>
>> Just to clarify, the cross posting to can.legal was done by our
resident
>> netloon and troll, Don Bayomi (taylorchuk) who is infamous for making
>> wild claims and allegations of "obvious criminal behaviour" as part
of
>> his reason for living in Usenet to avoid the real world. He also
enjoys
>> cross-posting to other groups as he trolls for new bites. Amazingly,
>> this time he actually chose an on-topic group, so there's still hope
for
>> him.
>>
>> I mentioned that I had downloaded and watched "One Hour Photo" about
>> three months ago. At that time it wasn't in the theatres. No idea why
it
>> took so long to show here. Regardless, even if it was showing, it
would
>> still not be "criminal behaviour" to view it. That led to him spewing
>> his usual crap. Of course, I asked him, as I usually do, to supply
>> something to support his claim. Devoid of facts or rational arguments
he
>> did his usual "tell a lie long enough and the people will believe it"
>> dog and pony show.
>>
>> To date, no-one has shown me anything in Canadian law that makes it
>> "criminal behaviour" to do what I did. Not copy and distribute it,
just
>> view it. And I'm still waiting for the fool and his wannabe to show
me
>> it is. Until then, I'll continue on with a perfectly legal activity
>> without regard to the wishes of "Hollywood" (his rather bent claim to
>> authority).
>> HTH
>> --
>> Peter D
>>
>>
>
>