Thread View: adobe.typography
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by umucl
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:35
Adobe vs Linotype
Author: umucl
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:35
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:35
7 lines
753 bytes
753 bytes
Hi folks, does anybody know if this causes trouble, when I use Linotype fonts with Adobe products like Illustrator, InDesign or Photoshop? I use a G5 Mac, OS X 10.4.8 and Adobe CS2. Thanks
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: Bob Levine
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:42
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:42
3 lines
898 bytes
898 bytes
They're one of the top type foundries. Quality fonts. Bob
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: Neil_Keller
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:49
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:49
7 lines
935 bytes
935 bytes
umucl, As Bob says. Also, as Adobe licenses some of the Adobe library for inclusion in its own, just be sure that you do not have identically-named fonts installed and activated from both foundries. You can use fonts from any well-respected foundry, large or small, with your Adobe applications, Type 1, TrueType, or OpenType, with the same caveat. Neil
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: Don_McCahill
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:53
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:53
1 lines
661 bytes
661 bytes
At one time Linotype was very much in bed with Adobe. I would be surprised if their fonts failed to work.
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: umucl
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:51
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:51
1 lines
727 bytes
727 bytes
ok, thanks for your help. I'll buy them!
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: Dov Isaacs
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:37
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:37
3 lines
1216 bytes
1216 bytes
One thing you should examine before you license (you don't buy) fonts from any foundry is the EULA, the End User License Agreement. You may find that for identical fonts in the Adobe and Linotype libraries originally sourced from Linotype, the license is different, especially with regards to (1) your right to embed fonts in PDF, EPS, PostScript, or other files and (2) your ability to redistribute PDF, EPS, PostScript, or other files that have such fonts embedded without paying an additional license or royalty fee. Beware! - Dov
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: Neil_Keller
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:22
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:22
3 lines
805 bytes
805 bytes
As I recall (and Dov will correct me), Adobe's EULAs allow you to do both (1) and (2) without restrictions or extra fees. Neil
Re: Adobe vs Linotype
Author: Dov Isaacs
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:37
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:37
5 lines
723 bytes
723 bytes
Neil, Your response is correct! - Dov
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads