Thread View: alt.dur.test
57 messages
57 total messages
Page 1 of 2
Started by Trev
Fri, 03 Nov 2000 01:04
Page 1 of 2 • 57 total messages
RUMOURS
Author: Trev
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 01:04
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 01:04
8 lines
1085 bytes
1085 bytes
Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough padding. -- Trev - not my fault, guv'nor.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Trev
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
17 lines
1231 bytes
1231 bytes
On Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08:30 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. >Like what? That's the question, isn't it? What could they be... >> Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough >> padding. >He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be >really nasty, but refrained. I am worried that the prospect of working >all morning has altered my neural pathways. You watch too much Star Trek. -- Trev - but I love you anyway.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Gandalf
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
14 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
Trev (trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk) wrote: : On Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08:30 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> : wrote: : >> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. : >Like what? : That's the question, isn't it? What could they be... Should I give a hint? -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Trev
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
17 lines
1250 bytes
1250 bytes
On 3 Nov 2000 23:08:57 GMT, Gandalf <I.S.Davis@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >Trev (trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk) wrote: >: On Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08:30 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> >: wrote: >: >> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. >: >Like what? >: That's the question, isn't it? What could they be... >Should I give a hint? Well, Gandalf said we should change the rumour to 'goes like a train' so we know what he thinks. /me stitches up Gandalf. -- Trev
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Gandalf
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 00:00
22 lines
1471 bytes
1471 bytes
Trev (trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk) wrote: : On 3 Nov 2000 23:08:57 GMT, Gandalf <I.S.Davis@durham.ac.uk> wrote: : >Trev (trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk) wrote: : >: On Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08:30 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> : >: wrote: : >: >> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. : >: >Like what? : >: That's the question, isn't it? What could they be... : >Should I give a hint? : Well, Gandalf said we should change the rumour to 'goes like a : train' so we know what he thinks. : /me stitches up Gandalf. I think you'll find that i said nothing of the sort Trev :P -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dunc
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 04:53
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 04:53
15 lines
1514 bytes
1514 bytes
Trev wrote: > > Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. I dunno why Gandalf was so afraid to say this. > > Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > padding. > Oh IRC does get surreal sometimes... Dunc You've gotten off easy so many times, but I guess no one told you how to get a life.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08
17 lines
1472 bytes
1472 bytes
> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. Like what? > Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > padding. He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be really nasty, but refrained. I am worried that the prospect of working all morning has altered my neural pathways. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Gandalf
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 10:01
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 10:01
18 lines
1499 bytes
1499 bytes
Kate (K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk) wrote: : > Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. : Like what? : : > Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough : > padding. : He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be : really nasty, but refrained. I am worried that the prospect of working : all morning has altered my neural pathways. who needs nails for padding? -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: RUMOURS
Author: H J Leek
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:57
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 11:57
13 lines
1379 bytes
1379 bytes
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote: : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her??? : Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough :padding. Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even... Kate is rather less substantial than Tom. HJ
Re: RUMOURS
Author: T.J.York
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:28
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:28
18 lines
1266 bytes
1266 bytes
In dur.dsu.sf+f Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. > Like what? > >> Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough >> padding. > He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be But I could MAKE some. :) Tom -- You mean my sun-dried tomato himself? -Dan and Nick
Re: RUMOURS
Author: T.J.York
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:29
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:29
21 lines
1577 bytes
1577 bytes
In dur.dsu.sf+f H J Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote:
> : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner.
> Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is
> it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her???
>
> : Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough
> :padding.
> Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even...
> Kate is rather less substantial than Tom.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Now *that's* something I've never been referred to as before.
Tom
--
Tension, apprehension, and dissention have begun.
-Alfred Bester
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dunc
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:43
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 12:43
24 lines
2091 bytes
2091 bytes
T.J.York@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > In dur.dsu.sf+f H J Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote: > > : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. > > > Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is > > it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her??? > > > > : Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > > :padding. > > > Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even... > > Kate is rather less substantial than Tom. > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Now *that's* something I've never been referred to as before. > It's all relative isn't it? I thought physicists understood relativity. :) Dunc Even though my nose don't work, I smell trouble, I smell trouble.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: David Nutter
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:12
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:12
19 lines
1384 bytes
1384 bytes
Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > > padding. > > He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be > really nasty, but refrained. I am worried that the prospect of working > all morning has altered my neural pathways. Yes, they have been lined with shrubberies and paved with small glazed brick tiles. Regards, -david, caffienated -- David Nutter | We Like Zippy! I want a VEGETARIAN BURRITO to go.. with EXTRA MSG!!
Re: RUMOURS
Author: David Nutter
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:15
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:15
25 lines
1586 bytes
1586 bytes
H J Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote: > : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. > > Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is > it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her??? Well, he's just killing time until the Rohypnol is released by Customs... > Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even... > Kate is rather less substantial than Tom. One word: Liposuction. And we may even get some soap out of the deal... Regards, -david -- David Nutter | We Like Zippy! I'm CONTROLLED by the CIA!! EVERYONE is controlled by the CIA!!
Re: RUMOURS
Author: David Nutter
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:23
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:23
29 lines
1905 bytes
1905 bytes
H J Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote: > : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. > > Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is > it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her??? He's killing time until Customs release that case of Rohypnol and the specialist restraints. > : Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > :padding. > > Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even... > Kate is rather less substantial than Tom. Well, move a little flesh here and there and I'm sure we could get something that looked convincing in the dark/after a few pints. If nothing else we'll have found a suitable Frank N Furter for John's... Regards, -david scrubs up and checks the Braun Multiquick for sharpness -- David Nutter | We Like Zippy! That's a decision that can only be made between you & SY SPERLING!!
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dunc
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 14:29
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 14:29
26 lines
2154 bytes
2154 bytes
David Nutter wrote: > > H J Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote: > > : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. > > > > Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is > > it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her??? > > Well, he's just killing time until the Rohypnol is released by > Customs... > > > Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even... > > Kate is rather less substantial than Tom. > > One word: Liposuction. > > And we may even get some soap out of the deal... > Wooha lets go make big smiley faces across the front of the Prince Bishops centre in fire. :) Dunc I'm interested in things, I'm not a real doctor but I am a real worm.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 15:56
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 15:56
25 lines
1803 bytes
1803 bytes
David Nutter wrote: > > Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > > Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > > > padding. > > > > He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be > > really nasty, but refrained. I am worried that the prospect of working > > all morning has altered my neural pathways. > > Yes, they have been lined with shrubberies and paved with small glazed > brick tiles. The amount my brains hurting right now I'm thinking more glass shards and gorse bushes. > -david, caffienated Why? -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Trev
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00
28 lines
1695 bytes
1695 bytes
On Sat, 04 Nov 2000 01:47:48 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >Trev wrote: >> On Fri, 03 Nov 2000 08:08:30 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >> Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. >> >Like what? >> That's the question, isn't it? What could they be... >> >> Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough >> >> padding. >> >He'd never manage to grow the nails for starters. I was going to be >> >really nasty, but refrained. I am worried that the prospect of working >> >all morning has altered my neural pathways. >> You watch too much Star Trek. >I was thinking more biology at the time. Erk. >> Trev - but I love you anyway. >Really? Why do I not believe you? You don't believe I love you? Christ, woman, what have I got to do to get it through your skull? Have I been too subtle? <mutter, mutter> -- Trev - deeply in love. Honest.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
16 lines
1240 bytes
1240 bytes
> > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > verify that. > > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with this bad reputation. -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
13 lines
934 bytes
934 bytes
> > > Trev - but I love you anyway. > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > -- The truth is too much to handle. -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
15 lines
1086 bytes
1086 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway. > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > -- > The truth is too much to handle. In this case I think you may be right. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
20 lines
1463 bytes
1463 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > > verify that. > > > > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > this bad reputation. You were doing really well at the dodgy comments on Friday night. I thought that merited inclusion. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
25 lines
1558 bytes
1558 bytes
Kate wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > > > verify that. > > > > > > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > > > That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > this bad reputation. > > You were doing really well at the dodgy comments on Friday night. I > thought that merited inclusion. > They weren't anything on what I was coming out with last year. -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
21 lines
1181 bytes
1181 bytes
Kate wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway. > > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > -- > > The truth is too much to handle. > > In this case I think you may be right. > -- and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
24 lines
1597 bytes
1597 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Kate wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway. > > > > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > > -- > > > The truth is too much to handle. > > > > In this case I think you may be right. > > -- > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important No, cos everyone is always so truthful on newsgroups and only say things that they would say in real life... Dunc Summer's gone, days spent with grass and sun, I don't mind, to pretend I do seems really dumb.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
29 lines
1817 bytes
1817 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Kate wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > > > > verify that. > > > > > > > > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > > > > > That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > > implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > > this bad reputation. > > > > You were doing really well at the dodgy comments on Friday night. I > > thought that merited inclusion. > > > They weren't anything on what I was coming out with last year. No, you're obviously out of practice. That or Jess is haveing a good effect on you. I fear the former is more accurate. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
36 lines
1993 bytes
1993 bytes
Kate wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Kate wrote: > > > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > > > > > verify that. > > > > > > > > > > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > > > > > > > That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > > > implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > > > this bad reputation. > > > > > > You were doing really well at the dodgy comments on Friday night. I > > > thought that merited inclusion. > > > > > They weren't anything on what I was coming out with last year. > > No, you're obviously out of practice. That or Jess is haveing a good > effect on you. I fear the former is more accurate. > I'm trying to get back into the spirit of things, but without Matt out every night to make me look better I am suffering -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
25 lines
1327 bytes
1327 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Kate wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway. > > > > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > > -- > > > The truth is too much to handle. > > > > In this case I think you may be right. > > -- > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important No never! -- -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
20 lines
1306 bytes
1306 bytes
Kate wrote: > Tom Bradley wrote: > > Kate wrote: > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > > The truth is too much to handle. > > > In this case I think you may be right. > > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important > No never! So has he proposed yet? -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
20 lines
1434 bytes
1434 bytes
Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: : > : > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to : > verify that. : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with : this bad reputation. I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no resemblance to what you might call reality [1] the roadrunner one -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
28 lines
1595 bytes
1595 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > : > > : > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > : > verify that. > : > > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > : this bad reputation. > > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > resemblance to what you might call reality > > [1] the roadrunner one Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
20 lines
1558 bytes
1558 bytes
Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. : > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with : > : this bad reputation. : > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no : > resemblance to what you might call reality : > : > [1] the roadrunner one : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition of cups of heavily sugared black coffee -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
27 lines
1672 bytes
1672 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > : > > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > : > : this bad reputation. > : > > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > : > resemblance to what you might call reality > : > > : > [1] the roadrunner one > > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee Suger in coffee is B&R -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Gandalf
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
24 lines
1672 bytes
1672 bytes
Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: : > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. : > : > : > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not : > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with : > : > : this bad reputation. : > : > : > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no : > : > resemblance to what you might call reality : > : > : > : > [1] the roadrunner one : > : > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? : > : > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition : > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee : Suger in coffee is B&R that's reality for you... -- "But look at us now, quit driving. Some things hurt more, much more than cars and girls. But look at us now, start counting, what adds up the way it did when we were young?" Prefab Sprout
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
30 lines
1764 bytes
1764 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > : > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > : > : > > : > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > : > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > : > : > : this bad reputation. > : > : > > : > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > : > : > resemblance to what you might call reality > : > : > > : > : > [1] the roadrunner one > : > > : > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > : > > : > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > : > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee > : Suger in coffee is B&R > > that's reality for you... > Not in my world. -- I need a bomb, I need a bomb, I need a caffeine bomb Wildhearts
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
20 lines
1441 bytes
1441 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Kate wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > Kate wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway > > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > > > The truth is too much to handle. > > > > In this case I think you may be right. > > > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important > > No never! > So has he proposed yet? No - thank god. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
25 lines
1613 bytes
1613 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > : > > : > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > : > verify that. > : > > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > : this bad reputation. > > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > resemblance to what you might call reality > > [1] the roadrunner one Which reality are you seeing it in then? -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Kate
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
25 lines
1720 bytes
1720 bytes
Gandalf wrote: > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > : > > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > : > : this bad reputation. > : > > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > : > resemblance to what you might call reality > : > > : > [1] the roadrunner one > > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee It makes more sense now. -- Nick Bradbeer is the smoothest person I know. He's the kind of person who, if you ground up, would be very good as gear oil. Dave Nutter.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
31 lines
1503 bytes
1503 bytes
Dunc wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Kate wrote: > > > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > > > -- > > > > The truth is too much to handle. > > > > > > In this case I think you may be right. > > > -- > > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important > > No, cos everyone is always so truthful on newsgroups and only say things > that they would say in real life... > To True. When you next up here? -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
26 lines
1522 bytes
1522 bytes
Kate wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Kate wrote: > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Kate wrote: > > > > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway > > > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? > > > > > > The truth is too much to handle. > > > > > In this case I think you may be right. > > > > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important > > > No never! > > So has he proposed yet? > > No - thank god. Give him time, he is working his courage up. -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
22 lines
1672 bytes
1672 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > : > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > : > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > > : > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee > > : Suger in coffee is B&R > > that's reality for you... > > > Not in my world. > > -- > I need a bomb, I need a bomb, I need a caffeine bomb Bah, that was my sig once...good song though. Dunc Chances thrown, nothings free, longing for what used to be
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dunc
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
30 lines
2170 bytes
2170 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > : > > > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > : > : this bad reputation. > > : > > > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > > : > resemblance to what you might call reality > > : > > > : > [1] the roadrunner one > > > > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > > > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee > Suger in coffee is B&R > It depends on the coffee. A nice cup of real stuff doesn't need it. If you after stay awake silly instant then it can make it drinkable and add to the stimulant effect with a sugar rush. Dunc Rolling down the highway until the break of dawn, Driving a truck with my high heels on.
Re: RUMOURS
Author: HJ Leek
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
27 lines
1650 bytes
1650 bytes
Tom Bradley wrote: > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > > > : > > > : > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > > : > verify that. > > : > > > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > > > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > : this bad reputation. > > > > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > > resemblance to what you might call reality > > > > [1] the roadrunner one > > Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > Considering this is Gandalf... it has to be out of whack with the rest of humanity. HJ
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
29 lines
1619 bytes
1619 bytes
Dunc wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > > > : > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > > : > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > > > : > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee > > > : Suger in coffee is B&R > > > that's reality for you... > > > > > Not in my world. > > > > -- > > I need a bomb, I need a bomb, I need a caffeine bomb > > Bah, that was my sig once...good song though. > It's not my sig, but it seemed appropriate. -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
37 lines
2144 bytes
2144 bytes
Dunc wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > > : > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > > : > > > > : > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > > : > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > > : > : this bad reputation. > > > : > > > > : > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > > > : > resemblance to what you might call reality > > > : > > > > : > [1] the roadrunner one > > > > > > : Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > > > > > This is a purely hypothetcial reality in which existance is a supposition > > > of cups of heavily sugared black coffee > > Suger in coffee is B&R > > > It depends on the coffee. A nice cup of real stuff doesn't need it. If > you after stay awake silly instant then it can make it drinkable and add > to the stimulant effect with a sugar rush. > OK restaurant coffee needs lots of sugar, otherwise it can do without and taste better -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Tom Bradley
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
38 lines
1963 bytes
1963 bytes
HJ Leek wrote: > > Tom Bradley wrote: > > > > Gandalf wrote: > > > > > > Tom Bradley (t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk) wrote: > > > > > > : > > > > : > I believe Gandalf. And besides neither of you have been a position to > > > : > verify that. > > > : > > > > : > And Yes, Trev, Tom and Braddas I do know what I just wrote. > > > > > > : That's unfair, why does my name still get on this list. I have not > > > : implied anything really bad for at least a week. Am I just stuck with > > > : this bad reputation. > > > > > > I envented that particular rumour[1] by the way Kate, it bears no > > > resemblance to what you might call reality > > > > > > [1] the roadrunner one > > > > Is this reality different to what the rest of us may call reality?? > > > Considering this is Gandalf... it has to be out of whack with the rest > of humanity. Gandalf lives in the real world, it is the rest of us who are strange and disturbed. -- Everyone here hates everyone here For doing the same thing that they do. Less Than Jake
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
13 lines
1421 bytes
1421 bytes
On Sun, 05 Nov 2000 15:28:15 +0000, Tom Bradley <t.j.bradley@dur.ac.uk> wrote: >Kate wrote:> >> No, you're obviously out of practice. That or Jess is haveing a good >> effect on you. I fear the former is more accurate. >> >I'm trying to get back into the spirit of things, but without Matt out >every night to make me look better I am suffering At last! A valid reason for me to be in Durham! -- Trev
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Trev
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2000 00:00
23 lines
1544 bytes
1544 bytes
On Sun, 05 Nov 2000 16:17:28 +0000, Kate <K.J.Dobson@durham.ac.uk> wrote: >Tom Bradley wrote: >> >> Kate wrote: >> > Tom Bradley wrote: >> > > Kate wrote: >> > > > Tom Bradley wrote: >> > > > > > > Trev - but I love you anyway >> > > > > > Really? Why do I not believe you? >> > > > > The truth is too much to handle. >> > > > In this case I think you may be right. >> > > and Trev would never lie on a newsgroup about anything important >> > No never! >> So has he proposed yet? >No - thank god. Yes I have! I asked you to marry me and have my children on many occassions. -- Trev
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Dolphin
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00
32 lines
1702 bytes
1702 bytes
David Nutter wrote: > > H J Leek <H.J.Leek@durham.ac.uk> writes: > > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Trev wrote: > > : Rumour: Kate does more than one thing like Roadrunner. > > > > Do you like being in trouble with people (specifically Kate), Trev?? Is > > it a part of your 8-yr-old schoolboy style plan to seduce her??? > > He's killing time until Customs release that case of Rohypnol and the > specialist restraints. > > > : Rumour: Tom secretly dreams of being Kate, but can't find enough > > :padding. > > > > Wouldn't that involve chopping rather than padding?? Or both, even... > > Kate is rather less substantial than Tom. > > Well, move a little flesh here and there and I'm sure we could get > something that looked convincing in the dark/after a few pints. If > nothing else we'll have found a suitable Frank N Furter for John's... > > Regards, > > -david scrubs up and checks the Braun Multiquick for sharpness ARGHHHHHH!!! *eyes water*
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Timothy Lee
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00
12 lines
1497 bytes
1497 bytes
In article <3A05C71A.4B0764D1@dunelm.org.uk>, Dunc <Duncan.Taylor@dunelm.org.uk> writes >It depends on the coffee. A nice cup of real stuff doesn't need it. If >you after stay awake silly instant then it can make it drinkable and add >to the stimulant effect with a sugar rush. > Has anyone tried, caffeinated peppermints? I got some with mandrake 7.2 (made by Penguin) if you are drinking tea or coffee at around the same time they seem a bit dodgy. -- Timothy Lee http://www.town-village.demon.co.uk
Re: RUMOURS
Author: Timothy Lee
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00
11 lines
1269 bytes
1269 bytes
In article <3a042d0d.933659@news.freeserve.net>, Trev <trevor.roberts@dunelm.org.uk> writes > You don't believe I love you? Christ, woman, what have I got to do >to get it through your skull? Have I been too subtle? As in Men Behaving Badly, you don't love here but you want to perform certain acts with her, that she really out to try out and see if they develop into something. -- Timothy Lee http://www.town-village.demon.co.uk
Page 1 of 2 • 57 total messages
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads