Article View: alt.windows98
Article #151Re: License discussion was How do you to tell if you windows 98se is legal?
From: MEB
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 04:42
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 04:42
167 lines
8621 bytes
8621 bytes
Rod Speed wrote:
> MEB wrote:
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> MEB wrote:
>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> MEB wrote:
>>>>>> Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>>>>>> MEB wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sunny wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "MEB" <MEB-nothere@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:%23PpvN5nPKHA.4244@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>> Sunny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "MEB" <MEB-nothere@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:%23w3tGmnPKHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sunny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MEB" <MEB-nothere@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:%23nRz5TnPKHA.4004@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MEB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, Microsoft runs filters here {so do many of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer points},
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your post didn't make it...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Here"? This is usenet. Microsoft can do what they damn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their server, makes no difference to the majority (people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who are actually using usenet, not Microsoft's dumbed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down web based forums).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No here, on the master for the forum via NNTP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong, even Microsoft calls it a "newsgroup" as distinct
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from a web based
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "forum"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no such thing as a "master" on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No internet browser is required to access any news server.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong, and WE did this before.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You sure aren't going to get the newsgroups without either a
>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet interfaced newsreader, or via direct download FROM
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Internet or its
>>>>>>>>>>>> equivalent and some text based alternative... so your
>>>>>>>>>>>> argument is without basis, its still basically the web or
>>>>>>>>>>>> the old style BBS recovery. Or is it you think it just
>>>>>>>>>>>> magically appears on your computer...
>>>>>>>>>>> You are so pedantic, yet you don't seem to absorb the written
>>>>>>>>>>> word? What part of my "No internet browser is required to
>>>>>>>>>>> access any news server" don't you understand?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How about you jam your smartarse "you think it just magically
>>>>>>>>>>> appears on
>>>>>>>>>>> your computer..."
>>>>>>>>>>> where the sun don't shine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What part of you're using an INTERNET BASED NEWSREADER
>>>>>>>>>> addressing the SAME forum don't you understand or do you
>>>>>>>>>> think the messages just magically appear in your reader...
>>>>>>>>> My "BROWSER" is not open or ACTIVE while I am sending this
>>>>>>>>> message on Usenet, you goose.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NO but your web based newsreader IS, ya duck..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are spoiling your arguments by using the terms web and
>>>>>>> Internet interchangably. Think Internet as being a connection
>>>>>>> of multiple networks and the WWW as being an application or
>>>>>>> protocol which runs on top of the Internet, as does SMTP, NNTP,
>>>>>>> FTP and others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not really, the protocols used, the "what makes up the Internet",
>>>>>> which is referred to generally as the Web, determines what occurs.
>>>>>> Without them there is none, not the Internet or the Web,
>>>>>> regardless of the term used. Throw in an application, and all the
>>>>>> broadcasts, IPs, and other become a usable presentation. The
>>>>>> basic difference? The application and protocol.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issue and misunderstanding seems to be the protocols and their
>>>>>> usage, e.g., the application used to connect to the Web/Internet
>>>>>> USING a specific protocol. Regardless of the method, it still
>>>>>> remains the Web/Internet, only the application and resultant
>>>>>> protocol used changes [as do ports and other aspects, but that is
>>>>>> a different discussion]. The actual stream [Internet/Web] carries
>>>>>> multiple protocols within it; it is the application [and whatever
>>>>>> local and distant other requirements need] that determines the
>>>>>> "connection" to whatever offered.
>>>>> You keep implying that the terms Web/Internet are interchangable.
>>>>> They arent.
>>>>>
>>>>> usenet has NOTHING to do with the web.
>>>> Ok, so where are you receiving the newsgroups from
>>> You can see that in the headers.
>>>
>>>> and via what [and I don't mean the app used]?
>>> NNTP. Nothing to do with the web.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The Internet is an internet.
>>
>> The Web is a web.
>
>> The NTTP servers are on the Internet.
>
> But have absolutely nothing to do with any web.
>
>> The Web is on the Internet.
>
> Irrelevant to whether any NNTP server has anything to do with any web.
>
>> An intranet may contain an NNTP server and not connect to the Internet.
>
> Irrelevant to whether any NNTP server has anything to do with any web.
>
>> A web may contain messages from a news group.
>
> Irrelevant to whether any NNTP server has anything to do with any web.
>
>> The Web may contain messages from Usenets, Forums, private
>> internets or intranets, News, newsgroups, and news postings.
>
> Irrelevant to whether any NNTP server has anything to do with any web.
>
>> The Internet contains webs, the Web, newsgroups, News servers, http servers, etc...
>
> Irrelevant to whether any NNTP server has anything to do with any web.
>
>> Now split them from each other...
>
> Just did.
>
>> its a ludicrous argument...
>
> Your sig is sposed to be last, with a line with just -- on it in front of it.
>
>> the world changes and so does how its perceived.
>
> Irrelevant to whether any NNTP server has anything to do with any web.
>
>> Just one more attempt to make Usenet something special...
>
> Nope, just rubbing your pig ignorant nose in the FACT that an NNTP server has nothing to do with any web.
>
>> it was originally, now is another matter.
>
> Wrong, as always.
>
>
Well you may have your personal chance to do exactly that, prove me wrong.
Of course it will take more than the normal Usenet crap. Your going to
have to post info, liks, and all the things required to do so.
What YOU posted means *squat*.
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e9Q7SwyPKHA.5108@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.250.MISMATCH!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!msrn-out!msrtrans!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gblReferences:
<7hqrujF2u4vm3U1@mid.individual.net> <ugRhrMgPKHA.3540@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl> <7i4vpiF301h65U1@mid.individual.net> <4ABD5BBF.92E16043@Guy.com> <7i56vqF2tmoa6U1@mid.individual.net> <4ABD704E.AC67E885@Guy.com> <uITDXhlPKHA.1372@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl> <4abd8d54$0$12671$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <uB2FZBmPKHA.220@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl> <4abd9833$0$12669$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <OrI16fmPKHA.3876@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <4abda7c2$0$12673$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <#nRz5TnPKHA.4004@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl> <ekx6BdnPKHA.5032@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl> <#w3tGmnPKHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <OiDJDtnPKHA.4244@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <#PpvN5nPKHA.4244@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <uM47I#nPKHA.1232@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl> <#wzvUCoPKHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <7i6d9fF30bsgnU1@mid.individual.net> <O3e3YSuPKHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <7i7hctF2vqucbU1@mid.individual.net> <7i87cbF2t0v45U3@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f3008de57b,1b7257b35b01d6be X-Google-Attributes: gidf3008de57b,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:42:28 -0400 From: MEB <MEB-nothere@hotmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: License discussion was How do you to tell if you windows 98se is legal? References: <7hqrujF2u4vm3U1@mid.individual.net> <ugRhrMgPKHA.3540@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl> <7i4vpiF301h65U1@mid.individual.net> <4ABD5BBF.92E16043@Guy.com> <7i56vqF2tmoa6U1@mid.individual.net> <4ABD704E.AC67E885@Guy.com> <uITDXhlPKHA.1372@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl> <4abd8d54$0$12671$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <uB2FZBmPKHA.220@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl> <4abd9833$0$12669$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <OrI16fmPKHA.3876@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <4abda7c2$0$12673$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> <#nRz5TnPKHA.4004@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl> <ekx6BdnPKHA.5032@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl> <#w3tGmnPKHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <OiDJDtnPKHA.4244@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <#PpvN5nPKHA.4244@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <uM47I#nPKHA.1232@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl> <#wzvUCoPKHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <7i6d9fF30bsgnU1@mid.individual.net> <O3e3YSuPKHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl> <7i7hctF2vqucbU1@mid.individual.net> <7i87cbF2t0v45U3@mid.individual.net> In-Reply-To: <7i87cbF2t0v45U3@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <e9Q7SwyPKHA.5108@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl> Newsgroups: alt.windows98,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion,aus.computers NNTP-Posting-Host: oh-76-2-218-41.dhcp.embarqhsd.net 76.2.218.41 Lines: 1 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.250.MISMATCH!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!msrn-out!msrtrans!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl