🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <CoA90p.56w@cuug.ab.ca>, Roy Brander <branderr@cuug.ab.ca> wrote:

Uh oh, doorhead here wants to start a flame war.  Ok, dork, since you're
accusing me of not having read various things about Canadian law, let's just
juxtapose two lines to see how competent you are:


I wrote (quoting from your quote no less):

>: probably an outright death threat is in
>: violation of Canadian law.. but there's no doubt some middle ground
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>: threat which is fine under Canadian law (what's a president?) but
>: totally illegal in the U.S.A.?


To which you wrote:

>They have a law against
>threatening their president; we have laws against threatening ANYBODY.
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Read much?  I don't claim to know what the middle ground threat might be,
I'm just speculating that there might be one.  Clearly an outright
deaththreat is too far -- but apparently you don't comprehend English
well enough to understand what I said, so why am I bothering now?


>But I do have a  copy of the book
>on hand, so I know more than you bothered to learn...

Grow up.  Since you can't read, your book obviously does you no good.
Go back to kindergarten, pal.  Don't post me another message because I
refuse to be drawn into some ridiculous pre-school flamewar.


Justin

--
Justin Wells     <rjwells@uwaterloo.ca, stem@io.org, stem@sizone.pci.on.ca>

 "Knowledge for its own sake" -- that is the last snare of morality:  with
 that one becomes completely entangled in it once more.     - F. Nietzsche