🚀 go-pugleaf

Christopher Mountford (cjmount@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU) wrote:
>newton@cleese.apana.org.au (Mark Newton) writes:
...
>>You want to talk about context?  Well hear this:  Rosie's message was
>>out of the context of this forum, which would go a good way towards
>>explaining why she isn't being taken seriously.  aus.org.efa is a newsgroup
>>for discussing legal issues of electronic communications -- Should we
>>take her seriously?  

>Sexism on the net is an issue of electronic communications. Yes you
>should take everyone seriously if you are to be taken for something
>other than a joke yourself.

What has "sexism on the net" got to do with rosiex's complaint? Her
complaint was an attempt to whip up a PC lynch mob against Dwayne
because of something he said which had no bearing whatsoever on her
gender and a great deal to do with her journalistic exploitation of a
particular minority (ravers). Just because rosiex found crying "sexism" 
easier than answering Dwayne's criticisms doesn't make it so.

....

[several k. of radical post-structualist b.s. deleted for net's sake]
--
		  People who like this sort of thing
       	      will find this the sort of thing they like.
Tim J.Benham                                       bentj93@cs.adfa.oz.au