🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3adjmh$cu3@news.primenet.com> lionhart@primenet.com (Richard Taylor) writes:

>No.. the comment was about 'message traffic' in the 'bloat' (I think.. 
>I'll have to see if I still can find it..)

It's possible, I have the added "benefit" of discussing it with him in person. 
 I could be reading something into the post that wasn't there or was 
miscommunicated.  You kinda have to "read between the lines" with a lot of 
Woody's posts.

>"On that Mollari we can at least agree.."

>Yes, let's get some more people in here that are interested in the 
>discussion, not just wanting to piss someone off for their own little 
>games...

Well, better do it fast.  I think (I haven't looked yet) that they are holding 
the vote even as we speak.

I will make sure that the people on the Fusion Patrol maillist are reminded to 
poke their noses in and make an opinion one way or another.

When it comes to the electronic forums I have been repeatedly unimpressed by 
the amount of AZ support exists.  I've tried engendering interest, I know many 
others who have tried, but none of the results have been overwhelming.  In 
fact, I think that considering the amount of computer literacy in SF fans, the 
amount has been pathetic.

Fandom in general is in one of its apathetic swings right now, that doesn't 
help.

>I'm amazed.. wrong about someone twice in one day...  you make some 
>intelligent and worthwhile comments Eugene..

I try not to make a habit of it.  :-)